Withdrawal Advance Ruling application allowed if Agreement cancelled : AAR

By | May 6, 2020
(Last Updated On: May 6, 2020)

Withdrawal Advance Ruling application allowed if Agreement cancelled : AAR

AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, KARNATAKA

Enlivening Technologies (P.) Ltd., In re

DR. RAVIPRASAD M.P. AND MASHHOOD UR REHMAN FAROOQUI MEMBER

ADVANCE RULING NO. KAR ADRG 05/2020

FEBRUARY  17, 2020

ORDER

 

1. M/s Enlivening Technologies Pvt. Ltd., (called as the ‘Applicant’ hereinafter), 5th Floor, Varthur Main Road, Ramagondanahalli, Bengaluru – 560 066, Karnataka, having GSTIN number 29AADCE7184P1ZT, have filed an application for Advance Ruling under section 97 of CGST Act, 2017 & KGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 104 of CGST Rules 2017 & KGST Rules 2017, in form GST ARA-01 discharging the fee of Rs. 5,000/- each under , the CGST Act and the KGST Act.

2. The applicant is engaged in manufacture and supply of customized motor vehicles for businessmen, politicians and celebrities, which can also be bullet proof and blast resistance. The said motor vehicle is of 9 metre length, bullet & blast resistance, light armoured, fully built, Air-conditioned bus, of single axle BS-IV compliant, with diesel engine, can accommodate VIP dignitary, driver 8 to 9 security personnel. The bus is also customized to have meeting room/area, dining area, washroom, refrigerator and hydraulic platform to go on top of bus to address the public. The vehicle is meant to enable the VIP to continue office functions, even during transportation, and is lightly armoured to protect the VIP from specified terror attacks.

3. The applicant, in view of the above, seeks advance ruling, with regard to classification of the aforesaid motor vehicle (bus) and the GST applicable thereon, in respect of the following questions:

1.What would be the appropriate HSN classification for supply of motor vehicle (bus), which is bullet Proof, blast resistance and built to suit the requirement of a VIP, enabling the VIP to carry on with his administrative Junctions, even during transportation ?
2.What would be the applicable rate of GST and Cess for the said supply ?

4. The applicant had been given an opportunity of hearing on 9-1-2020. But the applicant vide their letter received in this office on 8-1-2020, requested this authority to permit them to withdraw their application, quoting the reason that the agreement with their customer is cancelled and the company would not be supplying such specialised goods in future.

5. In view of the above, we pass the following

RULING

The application filed by the Applicant for advance ruling is disposed off as withdrawn.

For latest Notification Refer Govt Website Click Here

GST Judgments on GST Refund

GST Officer to consider Refund of IGST paid on Export but not filled in shipping bills: HC

Refund IGST paid on ocean freight is allowed : HC

HC allowed to carry out modifications in GSTR-1 & GSTR-3B for taking IGST refund

Refund to UIN Agencies

Advisory to UIN Entities claiming GST Refunds Dated 09.11.2018

Video -GST Refund to UIN Agencies : CBIC Circular : GST News Part 216

Circular No 43/17/2018 GST : Processing of refund applications for UIN agencies

Circular No 37/11/2018 GST  Dated 15.03.18: exports related refund issues clarified by CBEC

Circular No 36/10/2018 GST : Refund applications of UIN entities

Ruling GST

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.