Registration can be revoked if the taxpayer files pending returns and pays taxes.

By | March 8, 2025

Registration can be revoked if the taxpayer files pending returns and pays taxes.

Opportunity Granted for Revocation of GST Registration Cancellation Upon Filing of Returns and Payment of Dues

Issue: Whether an assessee can be allowed to apply for revocation of cancellation of their GST registration after the registration has been cancelled for non-filing of returns, and under what conditions.

Facts:

  • The assessee’s GST registration was cancelled due to non-filing of returns.
  • The assessee expressed willingness to file the pending returns and pay all outstanding tax dues, including any applicable penalty.

Decision:

  • The court allowed the assessee to file an application for revocation of cancellation under Section 30(2) of the GST Act within two weeks.
  • The assessee was also required to file all pending returns and pay the outstanding tax dues along with the application.
  • The revenue authorities were directed to consider the assessee’s application and pass appropriate orders within four weeks.

Key Takeaways:

  • This case demonstrates the court’s leniency in granting taxpayers an opportunity to rectify their defaults and seek reinstatement of their GST registration.
  • By allowing the assessee to apply for revocation upon fulfilling the conditions of filing pending returns and paying outstanding dues, the court provides a chance for the assessee to restore their registration and continue their business operations.
  • This decision highlights the importance of compliance with tax laws but also acknowledges the possibility of genuine oversight or difficulty in meeting obligations, offering a path for rectification.
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
Saurabh Semwal
v.
Assistant Commissioner
Pankaj Purohit, J.
Writ Petition (M/S) No. 3111 of 2024
NOVEMBER  13, 2024
Pankaj Tiwari, learned counsel for the Petitioner. M.S. Bisht, learned Brief Holder for the Respondent.
ORDER
1. Petitioner is a proprietorship firm who runs a business under the name and style of ‘Shri Saurabh Semwal. Petitioner deals with works contract. Petitioner is registered under the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 (for short “the CGST Act, 2017”).
2. The registration of the petitioner has been cancelled by respondent no.1 vide order dated 12.09.2022 for non filing of the GST return.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that now the petitioner is ready to make the payment towards GST return as well as the penalty, if any, imposed by the respondent-department.
4. Petitioner has sought the following reliefs:-
“a. i. Issue a writ, order or direction, in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order of rejection of application for filing Revocation application of cancellation of registration bearing Reference No.ZA0510220584109 and dated 31.10.2022 issued by respondent no.1; (annexure 1)
b. issue a writ, order or direction, in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned show cause notice for application filed for revocation of cancellation of registration bearing Reference No.ZA051022008477Z and dated 13/10/2022 issued by the Respondent No.1; (Annexure 02)
c. issue a writ, order or direction, in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order for Cancellation of Registration bearing Reference No.ZA05092200867G dated 12/09/2022 issued by the Respondent No.1; (Annexure 03)
d. issue a writ, order or direction, in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned Show Cause Notice for Cancellation of Registration bearing Reference No.ZA050822008435S dated 10/08/2022 issued by the Respondent No.1; (Annexure 04)
e. issue a writ, order or direction, in the nature of mandamus directing the Respondent to revive the GST registration of the petitioner;
f. issue any other writ, order or direction and/or allow any other consequential relief as expedient in law, on the facts and circumstances of the case.”
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that identical controversy has been decided by this Court in WPMS No.2285 of 2024.
6. The said submission of learned counsel for the petitioner has not been opposed by learned counsel for the respondents.
7. In view of the consensus between the parties, the matter is covered by the order passed in WPMS No.2285 of 2024, the present writ petition is also decided in terms of the said order. The petitioner shall be at liberty to move an application for revocation or cancellation of the order under Section 30(2) of the CGST Act, 2017, within two weeks.
8. With this application, the petitioner shall also furnish all the GST returns, which he fails to submit and he will also deposit the outstanding tax and dues of the goods and service tax with his application. If he makes such an application within stipulated period, the Competent Authority shall consider petitioner’s application and pass appropriate order as per law, within four weeks thereafter.
9. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of.
10. Pending application, if any, stands disposed of.
Category: GST

About CA Satbir Singh

Chartered Accountant having 12+ years of Experience in Taxation , Finance and GST related matters and can be reached at Email : Taxheal@gmail.com