<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>GST CASE LAW 15.09.2026 Archives - Tax Heal</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.taxheal.com/tag/gst-case-law-15-09-2026/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.taxheal.com/tag/gst-case-law-15-09-2026</link>
	<description>Complete Guide for Income Tax and GST in India</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2026 10:24:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>GST CASE LAW 15.09.2026</title>
		<link>https://www.taxheal.com/gst-case-law-15-09-2026.html</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ashwani Kumar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2026 10:24:15 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10 different gst case laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Famous gst case laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST CASE LAW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST CASE LAW 15.09.2026]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST Case Laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST case laws book]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gst case laws digest 2026]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gst case laws for free]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST case laws Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gst case laws supreme court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gst itc case laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST law online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest case laws in gst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest gst case laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest gst case laws 2026]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.taxheal.com/?p=140739</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>GST CASE LAW 15.09.2026 &#160; Section Case Law Title Brief Summary Citation Relevant Act Section 9 Indian Wire Products Company, In re Hookah supply (tobacco/herbal) in restaurants is not &#8220;restaurant service&#8221; under Notif. 11/2017; treated as supply of goods. Click Here CGST Act, 2017 Section 16 Ezhupunna South Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd. v. State Tax… <span class="read-more"><a href="https://www.taxheal.com/gst-case-law-15-09-2026.html">Read More &#187;</a></span></p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2 style="text-align: center;">GST CASE LAW 15.09.2026</h2>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<div id="model-response-message-contentr_1fa3684d4e6ad761" class="markdown markdown-main-panel md-content enable-luminous-fast-follows enable-updated-hr-color tutor-markdown-rendering" dir="ltr" aria-busy="false" aria-live="polite">
<table data-path-to-node="0">
<thead>
<tr>
<td><strong>Section</strong></td>
<td><strong>Case Law Title</strong></td>
<td><strong>Brief Summary</strong></td>
<td><strong>Citation</strong></td>
<td><strong>Relevant Act</strong></td>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,1,0,0"><b data-path-to-node="0,1,0,0" data-index-in-node="0">Section 9</b></span></td>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,1,1,0"><i data-path-to-node="0,1,1,0" data-index-in-node="0">Indian Wire Products Company, In re</i></span></td>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,1,2,0">Hookah supply (tobacco/herbal) in restaurants is not &#8220;restaurant service&#8221; under Notif. 11/2017; treated as supply of goods.</span></td>
<td><a href="https://www.taxheal.com/r-srinivasa-naik-and-khalid-aizaz-anwar-member-2.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Click Here</a></td>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,1,4,0">CGST Act, 2017</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,2,0,0"><b data-path-to-node="0,2,0,0" data-index-in-node="0">Section 16</b></span></td>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,2,1,0"><i data-path-to-node="0,2,1,0" data-index-in-node="0">Ezhupunna South Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd. v. State Tax Officer</i></span></td>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,2,2,0">ITC cannot be denied under Sec 16(4) for Oct 2019–Mar 2020 if returns were filed before 30.11.2021 as per Sec 16(5).</span></td>
<td><a href="https://www.taxheal.com/ziyad-rahman-a-a-j-48.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Click Here</a></td>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,2,4,0">CGST Act, 2017</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,3,0,0"><b data-path-to-node="0,3,0,0" data-index-in-node="0">Section 54</b></span></td>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,3,1,0"><i data-path-to-node="0,3,1,0" data-index-in-node="0">ABE Service (P.) Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner</i></span></td>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,3,2,0">Refund cannot be rejected at scrutiny via Rule 90(2) for portal selection errors or lack of FIRC when Remittance Advice is produced.</span></td>
<td><a href="https://www.taxheal.com/ziyad-rahman-a-a-j-49.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Click Here</a></td>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,3,4,0">CGST Act, 2017</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,4,0,0"><b data-path-to-node="0,4,0,0" data-index-in-node="0">Section 54</b></span></td>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,4,1,0"><i data-path-to-node="0,4,1,0" data-index-in-node="0">L.S. Pacific wood tech (P.) Ltd. v. Commercial tax officer</i></span></td>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,4,2,0">Rejection of refund on limitation grounds via Rule 90(3) deficiency memo is impermissible; requires SCN under Rule 92(3).</span></td>
<td><a href="https://www.taxheal.com/senthilkumar-ramamoorthy-j-26.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Click Here</a></td>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,4,4,0">CGST Act, 2017</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,5,0,0"><b data-path-to-node="0,5,0,0" data-index-in-node="0">Section 54</b></span></td>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,5,1,0"><i data-path-to-node="0,5,1,0" data-index-in-node="0">ADV Industrial Services (P.) Ltd. v. Union of India</i></span></td>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,5,2,0">Once demand is quashed on appeal, refund authority must grant consequential refund without demanding explicit appellate directions.</span></td>
<td><a href="https://www.taxheal.com/aparesh-kumar-singh-cj-7.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Click Here</a></td>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,5,4,0">CGST Act, 2017</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,6,0,0"><b data-path-to-node="0,6,0,0" data-index-in-node="0">Section 54</b></span></td>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,6,1,0"><i data-path-to-node="0,6,1,0" data-index-in-node="0">ADV Industrial Services (P.) Ltd. v. Union of India</i></span></td>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,6,2,0">Withholding refund based on a prospective/unfiled departmental appeal or capitalization entries without hearing is illegal.</span></td>
<td><a href="https://www.taxheal.com/aparesh-kumar-singh-cj-7.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Click Here</a></td>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,6,4,0">CGST Act, 2017</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,7,0,0"><b data-path-to-node="0,7,0,0" data-index-in-node="0">Section 69</b></span></td>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,7,1,0"><i data-path-to-node="0,7,1,0" data-index-in-node="0">Navinder Singh Saiidev v. DGGI, Chandigarh</i></span></td>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,7,2,0">Bail granted in GST evasion/gaming receipt case after 4 months custody as investigation was complete and evidence was documentary.</span></td>
<td><a href="https://www.taxheal.com/ms-shalini-singh-nagpal-j-3.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Click Here</a></td>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,7,4,0">CGST Act, 2017</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,8,0,0"><b data-path-to-node="0,8,0,0" data-index-in-node="0">Section 73</b></span></td>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,8,1,0"><i data-path-to-node="0,8,1,0" data-index-in-node="0">Ganesh Valmik Bawane v. Joint Director, DGGI</i></span></td>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,8,2,0">Composite SCN clubbing multiple financial years is invalid; GST liabilities and limitation periods must be assessed year-wise.</span></td>
<td><a href="https://www.taxheal.com/anil-l-pansare-and-nivedita-p-mehta-jj-4.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Click Here</a></td>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,8,4,0">CGST Act, 2017</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,9,0,0"><b data-path-to-node="0,9,0,0" data-index-in-node="0">Section 74</b></span></td>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,9,1,0"><i data-path-to-node="0,9,1,0" data-index-in-node="0">Phoenix Medical Systems (P.) Ltd. v. State of AP</i></span></td>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,9,2,0">Failure to grant mandatory hearing under Sec 75(4) and ignoring reply invalidates DRC-07 assessment order.</span></td>
<td><a href="https://www.taxheal.com/gh-court-of-andhra-pradesh-phoenix-medical-syatems-p-ltd-v-state-of-andhra-pradesh-ninala-jayasurya-and-t-c-d-sekhar-jj-writ-petition-no-22371-of-2024-july-8-2026.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Click Here</a></td>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,9,4,0">CGST Act, 2017</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,10,0,0"><b data-path-to-node="0,10,0,0" data-index-in-node="0">Section 79</b></span></td>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,10,1,0"><i data-path-to-node="0,10,1,0" data-index-in-node="0">CBIGS Apparels and Jewels v. Joint Commissioner</i></span></td>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,10,2,0">Garnishee attachment of director&#8217;s bank account for unrecovered GSTR-1 dues of liquidated company is valid under joint/several liability.</span></td>
<td><a href="https://www.taxheal.com/c-saravanan-j-30.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Click Here</a></td>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,10,4,0">CGST Act, 2017</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,11,0,0"><b data-path-to-node="0,11,0,0" data-index-in-node="0">Section 79</b></span></td>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,11,1,0"><i data-path-to-node="0,11,1,0" data-index-in-node="0">CBIGS Apparels and Jewels v. Joint Commissioner</i></span></td>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,11,2,0">Corporate veil lifted to attach bank account of related entity created by common family promoters to evade tax recovery.</span></td>
<td><a href="https://www.taxheal.com/c-saravanan-j-30.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Click Here</a></td>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,11,4,0">CGST Act, 2017</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,12,0,0"><b data-path-to-node="0,12,0,0" data-index-in-node="0">Section 79</b></span></td>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,12,1,0"><i data-path-to-node="0,12,1,0" data-index-in-node="0">CBIGS Apparels and Jewels v. Joint Commissioner</i></span></td>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,12,2,0">Attachment of partnership firm&#8217;s account for company dues sustained where partner was a director in defaulting company during default period.</span></td>
<td><a href="https://www.taxheal.com/c-saravanan-j-30.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Click Here</a></td>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,12,4,0">CGST Act, 2017</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,13,0,0"><b data-path-to-node="0,13,0,0" data-index-in-node="0">Section 107</b></span></td>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,13,1,0"><i data-path-to-node="0,13,1,0" data-index-in-node="0">Phoenix Medical Systems (P.) Ltd. v. State of AP</i></span></td>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,13,2,0">Assessment order passed without natural justice quashed; dismissal of appeal as time-barred consequently set aside.</span></td>
<td><a href="https://www.taxheal.com/gh-court-of-andhra-pradesh-phoenix-medical-syatems-p-ltd-v-state-of-andhra-pradesh-ninala-jayasurya-and-t-c-d-sekhar-jj-writ-petition-no-22371-of-2024-july-8-2026.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Click Here</a></td>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,13,4,0">CGST Act, 2017</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,14,0,0"><b data-path-to-node="0,14,0,0" data-index-in-node="0">Section 107</b></span></td>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,14,1,0"><i data-path-to-node="0,14,1,0" data-index-in-node="0">ADV Industrial Services (P.) Ltd. v. Union of India</i></span></td>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,14,2,0">Operative appellate order allowing ITC refund is binding on refund officer, even if department proposes to file a further appeal.</span></td>
<td><a href="https://www.taxheal.com/aparesh-kumar-singh-cj-7.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Click Here</a></td>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,14,4,0">CGST Act, 2017</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,15,0,0"><b data-path-to-node="0,15,0,0" data-index-in-node="0">Section 112</b></span></td>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,15,1,0"><i data-path-to-node="0,15,1,0" data-index-in-node="0">PVCON Engineering v. CGST and Central Excise Bhopal</i></span></td>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,15,2,0">Writ petition challenging penalty order not maintainable when alternative remedy before GST Tribunal with grace period is available.</span></td>
<td><a href="https://www.taxheal.com/and-pradeep-mittal-j.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Click Here</a></td>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,15,4,0">CGST Act, 2017</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,16,0,0"><b data-path-to-node="0,16,0,0" data-index-in-node="0">Section 129</b></span></td>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,16,1,0"><i data-path-to-node="0,16,1,0" data-index-in-node="0">Ferrous Infra Solutions v. Commr. SGST UP</i></span></td>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,16,2,0">Mismatch of vehicle number without updating Part-B of e-way bill or contemporaneous proof of breakdown justifies detention/penalty.</span></td>
<td><a href="https://www.taxheal.com/and-arvind-kumar-technical-member-4.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Click Here</a></td>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,16,4,0">CGST Act, 2017</span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
