| Section 9 |
Indian Wire Products Company, In re |
Hookah supply (tobacco/herbal) in restaurants is not “restaurant service” under Notif. 11/2017; treated as supply of goods. |
Click Here |
CGST Act, 2017 |
| Section 16 |
Ezhupunna South Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd. v. State Tax Officer |
ITC cannot be denied under Sec 16(4) for Oct 2019–Mar 2020 if returns were filed before 30.11.2021 as per Sec 16(5). |
Click Here |
CGST Act, 2017 |
| Section 54 |
ABE Service (P.) Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner |
Refund cannot be rejected at scrutiny via Rule 90(2) for portal selection errors or lack of FIRC when Remittance Advice is produced. |
Click Here |
CGST Act, 2017 |
| Section 54 |
L.S. Pacific wood tech (P.) Ltd. v. Commercial tax officer |
Rejection of refund on limitation grounds via Rule 90(3) deficiency memo is impermissible; requires SCN under Rule 92(3). |
Click Here |
CGST Act, 2017 |
| Section 54 |
ADV Industrial Services (P.) Ltd. v. Union of India |
Once demand is quashed on appeal, refund authority must grant consequential refund without demanding explicit appellate directions. |
Click Here |
CGST Act, 2017 |
| Section 54 |
ADV Industrial Services (P.) Ltd. v. Union of India |
Withholding refund based on a prospective/unfiled departmental appeal or capitalization entries without hearing is illegal. |
Click Here |
CGST Act, 2017 |
| Section 69 |
Navinder Singh Saiidev v. DGGI, Chandigarh |
Bail granted in GST evasion/gaming receipt case after 4 months custody as investigation was complete and evidence was documentary. |
Click Here |
CGST Act, 2017 |
| Section 73 |
Ganesh Valmik Bawane v. Joint Director, DGGI |
Composite SCN clubbing multiple financial years is invalid; GST liabilities and limitation periods must be assessed year-wise. |
Click Here |
CGST Act, 2017 |
| Section 74 |
Phoenix Medical Systems (P.) Ltd. v. State of AP |
Failure to grant mandatory hearing under Sec 75(4) and ignoring reply invalidates DRC-07 assessment order. |
Click Here |
CGST Act, 2017 |
| Section 79 |
CBIGS Apparels and Jewels v. Joint Commissioner |
Garnishee attachment of director’s bank account for unrecovered GSTR-1 dues of liquidated company is valid under joint/several liability. |
Click Here |
CGST Act, 2017 |
| Section 79 |
CBIGS Apparels and Jewels v. Joint Commissioner |
Corporate veil lifted to attach bank account of related entity created by common family promoters to evade tax recovery. |
Click Here |
CGST Act, 2017 |
| Section 79 |
CBIGS Apparels and Jewels v. Joint Commissioner |
Attachment of partnership firm’s account for company dues sustained where partner was a director in defaulting company during default period. |
Click Here |
CGST Act, 2017 |
| Section 107 |
Phoenix Medical Systems (P.) Ltd. v. State of AP |
Assessment order passed without natural justice quashed; dismissal of appeal as time-barred consequently set aside. |
Click Here |
CGST Act, 2017 |
| Section 107 |
ADV Industrial Services (P.) Ltd. v. Union of India |
Operative appellate order allowing ITC refund is binding on refund officer, even if department proposes to file a further appeal. |
Click Here |
CGST Act, 2017 |
| Section 112 |
PVCON Engineering v. CGST and Central Excise Bhopal |
Writ petition challenging penalty order not maintainable when alternative remedy before GST Tribunal with grace period is available. |
Click Here |
CGST Act, 2017 |
| Section 129 |
Ferrous Infra Solutions v. Commr. SGST UP |
Mismatch of vehicle number without updating Part-B of e-way bill or contemporaneous proof of breakdown justifies detention/penalty. |
Click Here |
CGST Act, 2017 |