IMPORTANT INCOME TAX CASE LAWS 12.01.2026
| Relevant Act | Section | Case Law Title | Brief Summary | Citation |
| Income-tax Act, 1961 | Section 32 / 37(1) | Spectris Technologies (P.) Ltd. v. ITO | [Non-Compete Fee] Following the landmark SC ruling in Sharp Business System, the AO was directed to treat Non-Compete Fees as Revenue Expenditure (deductible u/s 37) rather than a capital asset eligible for depreciation. | Click Here |
| Income-tax Act, 1961 | Section 92B / 92C | DCIT v. GMR Airports Ltd. | [Corporate Guarantee] Corporate Guarantees and Standby Letters of Credit (SBLC) are International Transactions. However, TP adjustment for SBLC must be restricted to the unrecovered commission cost. | Click Here |
| Income-tax Act, 1961 | Section 92C | Spectris Technologies (P.) Ltd. v. ITO | [Segmental TP] Where a business has distinct segments (e.g., Equipment Supply vs. After-Sales Services) with different risk/asset profiles, benchmarking must be done separately for each segment rather than at the entity level. | Click Here |
| Income-tax Act, 1961 | Section 54B | Pravinsinh Bhawansinh Vaghela v. ITO | [Agri Land Exemption] Expenses incurred on levelling and fencing newly purchased agricultural land are “intrinsically connected” to the acquisition and form part of the cost of acquisition eligible for Section 54B deduction. | Click Here |
For More :- Read IMPORTANT INCOME TAX CASE LAWS 09.01.2026