IMPORTANT INCOME TAX CASE LAWS 23.03.2026
| Relevant Act | Section | Case Law Title / Authority | Brief Summary | Citation |
| Income Tax Act | Sec 2(15) | Micro Finance Industry Network v. CIT(E) | A self-regulatory organization for NBFCs providing financial literacy and grievance redressal cannot be denied charitable status as “General Public Utility” without proof of commercial trade or business. | Click Here |
| Income Tax Act | Sec 9 & DTAA | DCIT (Int. Tax) v. Arun Madhavachari Rangachari | Consultancy fees paid to foreign companies owned by a UAE resident are not taxable in India if the individual has no fixed base in India and spent <183 days in the country. | Click Here |
| Income Tax Act | Sec 11 | Chitradurga Zilla Reddy Jana Sangha v. ITO | Set-off of excess expenditure from earlier years against current income was permissible prior to 01-04-2022 without the mandatory filing of Form 9A. | Click Here |
| Income Tax Act | Sec 54 | ITO v. Anju Madhan | Exemption is allowed even for an unregistered agreement to sell, provided the assessee took possession and made substantial payments (Section 53A of TPA). | Click Here |
| Income Tax Act | Sec 54F | DCIT (Int. Tax) v. Revanth Challagalla | NRI Relief: Exemption cannot be denied just because a house is registered in a sister’s name for convenience, provided the NRI funded it entirely and later received it back as a gift. | Click Here |
| Income Tax Act | Sec 80G | Ampacet Speciality products v. DCIT | Donations to the PM Relief Fund and Maharashtra CM Relief Fund are deductible; the bar on CSR-linked 80G claims applies only to specifically notified funds like Swachh Bharat Kosh. | Click Here |
| Income Tax Act | Sec 254 | MVR Projects (P.) Ltd. v. ITO | A delay of 2345 days (over 6 years) in filing an appeal will not be condoned if the reasons (counsel miscommunication/illness) are vague and suggest a lackadaisical approach. | Click Here |
For More :- Read IMPORTANT INCOME TAX CASE LAWS 21.03.2026