IMPORTANT GST CASE LAWS 24.03.2026
| Relevant Act | Section | Case Law Title / Authority | Brief Summary | Citation |
| CGST Act, 2017 | Section 29 | Trillion Lead Factory v. Superintendent | An SCN for cancellation is not “vague” if it includes annexed communications (like DGGI reports) that allow the taxpayer to understand and reply to the charges. | Click Here |
| CGST Act, 2017 | Section 50 | KJV Alloys Conductors v. UOI | Interest is mandatory on wrongly availed and retained transitional credit (TRAN-1), especially when the credit was reported in GSTR-3B but later reversed after a long delay (630 days). | Click Here |
| CGST Act, 2017 | Section 69 | Jai Kumar Aggarwal v. DGGI | Major Ruling: An arrest is vitiated and the person must be released if the Department fails to formally furnish the “Grounds of Arrest” as required by law. | Click Here |
| CGST Act, 2017 | Section 97 | CPL Pharmaceuticals (P.) Ltd., In re | Advance Ruling cannot be sought for past transactions (where construction is finished and invoices are already raised). It is only for “ongoing” or “proposed” supplies. | Click Here |
| CGST Act, 2017 | Section 130 | Krishna Industries v. State Tax Officer | The Department cannot bypass Section 129 (Detention) and jump directly to Section 130 (Confiscation) unless they specifically prove an “intent to evade tax.” | Click Here |
| CGST Act, 2017 | Section 171 | DGAP v. Kanwar Enterprises (P.) Ltd. | Anti-profiteering applies to construction rebates. Failure to pass on the full benefit of ITC/tax reduction to the client (NTPC) resulted in a profiteering order of ₹12.20 lakh. | Click Here |
For More :- Read IMPORTANT GST CASE LAWS 23.03.2026