Important GST Case Laws 30.04.2026

By | May 6, 2026

Important GST Case Laws 30.04.2026

Relevant Act Section Case Law Title Citation Brief Summary
CGST Act, 2017 Sec 54 CBF Component (P) Ltd v. Union of India Click Here Refund Rights: Rejection order set aside because the authority failed to grant the statutory 15-day period for a reply and denied a personal hearing.
IGST Act, 2017 Sec 16 Kunal Housewares (P.) Ltd. v. Union of India Click Here Zero-Rated Export: Refund allowed only after adjusting for differential duty drawback (to avoid double benefit) along with 7% interest.
CGST Act, 2017 Sec 73 Sri Gemini Enterprises v. Commercial Tax Officer Click Here Admitted Liability: Writ interference is denied where the assessee explicitly admitted the tax liability in their reply to the Show Cause Notice (SCN).
CGST Act, 2017 Sec 74 Komal Jayeshbhai Hemavat v. State Tax Officer Click Here Mandatory Hearing: Even if a taxpayer marks ‘No’ for a personal hearing in their reply, the authority must grant one before passing an adverse order.
CGST Act, 2017 Sec 75 Pathways Marketing and Consulting Group v. Asst. Comm. Click Here ITC Mismatch: Ex parte orders due to GSTR-3B vs 2A mismatch set aside; remanded to reply stage subject to a 10% tax deposit.
CGST Act, 2017 Sec 79 PVR Enterprises v. Deputy Commissioner (ST) Click Here Garnishee Recovery: Bank attachment vacated because the assessee had already reversed the disputed ITC; condition set to not pay the defaulting supplier.
CGST Act, 2017 Sec 83 Gujral Sons v. Union of India Click Here Provisional Attachment: Successive attachments without new material or change in facts after the assessment is concluded are unjustified and unsustainable.
CGST Act, 2017 Sec 93 Navin Vishwanathan v. State of Maharashtra Click Here Legal Representative: Recovery from a son for his deceased father’s dues is illegal without established succession or notice, despite similar trade names.
CGST Act, 2017 Sec 107 Rajesh Kumar Kar v. Addl. Commissioner (Appeals) Click Here Alternate Remedy: Writ petition dismissed; the court held that the petitioner must exhaust the statutory appellate forum even if alleging natural justice breach.
CGST Act, 2017 Sec 169 Delta Gencons India (P.) Ltd. v. Asst. Commissioner Click Here Service of Notice: Adjudication quashed because the SCN was not served via the registered portal email or address, violating principles of natural justice.

For More :- Read Important GST Case Laws 29.04.2026

Category: GST

About CA Satbir Singh

Chartered Accountant having 12+ years of Experience in Taxation , Finance and GST related matters and can be reached at Email : Taxheal@gmail.com