Composite GST Assessment Order Spanning Multiple Years Is Invalid and Liable to Be Quashed

By | May 19, 2026

Composite GST Assessment Order Spanning Multiple Years Is Invalid and Liable to Be Quashed

Issue

Whether the revenue authorities can legally issue a single, composite Show Cause Notice (SCN) or assessment order covering multiple tax periods across different financial years under Section 73 of the Act.


Facts

  • Context: The Petitioner-assessee was issued a single, composite assessment order by the respondent tax authority.

  • Period involved: The impugned composite order covered a vast timeframe spanning multiple tax periods from July 2017 to February 2022.

  • Legal Challenge: The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging the validity of the assessment, questioning whether the law permits a single composite order across multiple financial years.

  • Precedent cited: The matter relied upon a prior Division Bench ruling in S J Constructions v. Asstt. Commissioner, which clarified the strict timelines and boundaries for issuing GST notices and orders.


Decision

  • Composite Orders Held Invalid: The High Court held that a single composite assessment order spanning multiple years is legally unsustainable.

  • Strict Statutory Timeline Applied: Relying on the S J Constructions precedent, the Court noted that a single SCN or assessment cannot extend beyond one tax period prior to the due date of the annual return. Post the annual return due date, a single order cannot exceed one financial year.

  • Order Quashed: Because the impugned order was a composite mix across multiple financial years, the High Court set aside the assessment on this primary ground alone.

  • Remand with Conditions: The Court permitted the respondents to initiate fresh, separate proceedings on a year-wise basis, subject to the petitioner making a pre-deposit of 20%. All other grounds of the dispute were left open.


Key Takeaways

1. No Multi-Year Consolidation: Tax authorities cannot consolidate multiple financial years into one single SCN or assessment order under Section 73. Each financial year constitutes a separate unit for adjudication.

2. Year-Wise Proceedings Are Mandatory: Following the annual return due date, the revenue department is statutorily mandated to split its demands and issue separate, year-specific notices and orders.

3. Conditional Quashing: While procedural errors like issuing composite orders will result in the assessment being struck down, courts will frequently grant the department the liberty to restart the process correctly, often pinning it to a conditional pre-deposit by the taxpayer.

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
Aruna Slab Polishing Industries
v.
Assistant Commissioner*
R. Raghunandan Rao and T.C.D. Sekhar, JJ.
WRIT PETITION NO. 35441 of 2025
MAY  6, 2026
Anil Kumar Bezawada for the Petitioner.
ORDER
R. Raghunandan Rao, J. – Heard Sri M.K. Raj Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Commercial Tax appearing for the respondents.
2. The petitioner is a registered Company, which has been served with an order of assessment, dated 12.12.2022, passed by the 1st respondent. This order of assessment covers the period from July-2017 to February-2022.
3. The petitioner, after having raised various grounds of challenge, has pressed the ground that, a single order of assessment, issued for more than one financial year, would be violative of the provisions of Sections 73 & 74 of the GST Act, 2017 and consequently, set aside the impugned order of assessment.
4. A Division Bench of this Court, in S J Constructions v. Asstt. Commissioner 570/102 GSTL 348 (Andhra Pradesh)/W.P.Nos.11028 of 2025 & batch, after considering the said question, had held that, a single show-cause notice or a single composite assessment order, cannot be passed, in relation to more than one tax period of either a month if the assessment is taken up before the due date for filing of the annual return or for more than one year if the due date for filing of annual return has been reached.
5. The petitioner has raised various grounds of challenge. However, the petitioner is pressing the primary ground of the order of assessment being a composite order of assessment. In that view of the matter, the present Writ Petition is being disposed of, on this ground of challenge, leaving open the other grounds of challenge.
6. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of, setting aside the impugned order of assessment, dated 12.12.2022 and remand back to the respondents, leaving it open to the respondents to initiate fresh proceedings, for each assessment year separately, subject to payment of 20% of the disputed tax. Any payments made after the impugned order had been passed shall be adjusted against the aforesaid 20%. Coercive steps taken against the petitioner, including attachment, for recovery of the dues under this order shall also stand set aside. Needless to say, the period from the date of issuance of the impugned order of assessment till the date of receipt of this order shall be excluded for the purposes of limitation. There shall be no order as to costs.
7. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed.
Category: GST

About CA Satbir Singh

Chartered Accountant having 12+ years of Experience in Taxation , Finance and GST related matters and can be reached at Email : Taxheal@gmail.com