Retrospective Relief for Belated ITC: The Finance Act 2024 Shield

By | March 17, 2026

Retrospective Relief for Belated ITC: The Finance Act 2024 Shield

This ruling for AY 2026 (delivered in early 2026) reflects one of the most significant legislative “corrections” in the history of GST. It provides a life jacket to thousands of taxpayers who were denied Input Tax Credit (ITC) simply because they filed their returns after the strict deadlines of Section 16(4).


The Legal Issue

Can the Department deny ITC for early years of GST (FY 2017-18 to 2020-21) on the grounds of “limitation” if the taxpayer eventually filed the returns and paid the tax with late fees?


The “Game-Changing” Amendment

Through the Finance (No. 2) Act, 2024, the Government inserted two new sub-sections to Section 16, with retrospective effect from July 1, 2017:

  • Section 16(5): It overrides the standard time limit. For invoices pertaining to FY 2017-18, 2018-19, 2019-20, and 2020-21, the ITC is deemed to be validly availed if the return (GSTR-3B) was filed on or before November 30, 2021.

  • Section 16(6): It provides relief for taxpayers whose registration was cancelled and later revoked. It allows them to claim ITC for the “intervening period” (from cancellation to revocation) if the return is filed within 30 days of the revocation order.


The Decision

The High Court (following the Madras High Court’s lead in cases like Selva Vilas Jewellery and Power Builders) ruled in favour of the assessee:

  • Statutory Settlement: The Court held that the issue of “belated availment” is no longer a matter of debate. The retrospective amendment has removed the legal basis for denying credit solely because of the Section 16(4) time limit.

  • Remand for Merits: While the “time limit” hurdle is gone, the Court clarified that ITC is not an unconditional right. The matter was sent back to the Adjudicating Authority to verify:

    1. Possession of a valid tax invoice (Section 16(2)(a)).

    2. Actual receipt of goods or services (Section 16(2)(b)).

    3. Payment of tax by the supplier to the Government (Section 16(2)(c)).

  • Outcome: The original order (OIO) was set aside. If the petitioner proves compliance with all conditions other than the time limit, the tax demand, interest, and penalties must be dropped.


Key Takeaways for Taxpayers

  • Check Your Dates: If your ITC was denied for the first four years of GST (2017–2021), check if your GSTR-3B for those periods was filed by Nov 30, 2021. If yes, your credit is now legally “settled” as valid.

  • Rectification Opportunity: Under Circular No. 237/31/2024, taxpayers can apply for rectification of past orders within six months (usually until April 2025) if they didn’t file an appeal.

  • No Refundo Rule: Note that while you can stop future demands, the law (Section 150 of Finance Act 2024) specifically states that no refund will be granted for taxes already paid or ITC already reversed before this amendment came in.


HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Asian Lifts and Escalator (P.) Ltd.
v.
Assistant Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise*
C.Saravanan, J.
W.P. No.2296 of 2026
W.M.P. Nos. 2545 and 2546 of 2026
FEBRUARY  6, 2026
G.Natarajan for the Petitioner. Sai Srujan Tayi, Senior Standing Counsel for the Respondent.
ORDER
1. Mr.Sai Srujan Tayi, learned Senior Standing Counsel takes notice for the Respondent.
2. This Writ Petition is being disposed of at the stage of admission itself with the consent of the learned counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Government Advocate for the Respondent.
3. The petitioner is before this Court challenging the impugned order in Original No. 98/2024/GST/AC dated 08.08.2024 passed by the respondent. By the impugned order, the demand proposed in Show Cause notice No.66/2024/GST-AC dated 21.05.2024 has been confirmed and the Input Tax Credit (ITC) claimed belatedly by the petitioner has been denied under Section 16(4) of the respective GST Enactments.
4. Operative portion of the impugned order dated 08.08.2024 reads as under:-
“24. Accordingly, I pass the following order:
(i)I confirm the demand of GST of Rs.30,57,362/ (IGST of Rs.1,20,335/-, CGST Rs.11,44,865/-, SGST Rs.11,44,865/- and Cess-Rs.6,47,297/- (Rupees Thirty Lakh Fifty Seven Thousand Three Hundred Sixty Two Only) being the availment of ineligible ITC from them under Section 73(9)/73(1) of the CGST / TNGST, Act 2017 applicable to Section 20 of IGST Act, 2017 read with Section 11 of the GST (Compensation to States) Act, 2017 as discussed in para 14 to 19 above.
(ii)I confirm the demand of Interest from them for the demand as confirmed in Sl.No.24(i) above in terms of Section 50(3) of the CGST Act, 2017 as applicable to the provisions of TNGST Act, 2017 and Section 20 of IGST Act, 2017.
(iii)I impose a Penalty of Rs.3,05,736/- (IGST Rs.12,034/-, CGST Rs.1,14,486/-, SGST Rs.1,14,486/- and Cess Rs.64,730/-) (Rupees Three Lakh Five Thousand Seven Hundred and Thirty Six Only) under Section 122(2)(a) of the CGST Act, 2017 read with Section 73(1) and 73(9) of the CGST/SGST Act, 2017 as applicable to Section 20 of IGST Act, 2017 for the contravening the provisions of Section 16(4) of CGST/SGST Act, 2017 as applicable to Section 20 of IGST Act, 2017 for the demand confirmed in Para 24(i) above.
5. The issue with regard to belated availing of Input Tax Credit is no longer res integra and setled in favour of the petitioner by way of statutory intervention by insertion of Sections 16(5) and 16(6) vide Finance (No. 2) Act, 2024 (Act No. 15 of 2024) dated 16.08.2024 with effect from 27.09.2024 vide S.O. 4253(E), retrospectively with effect from 01.07.2017.
6. The substantial benefit of Input Tax Credit already availed by the petitioner cannot be denied merely on the ground of lapse of time. However, the issue as to whether the petitioner has satisfied the other statutory requirements for availing the Input Tax Credit is required to be adjudicated.
7. Considering the above, the impugned order is set aside and the matter is remitted back to the respondent to pass a fresh order on merits as expeditiously as possible, after hearing the petitioner and in accordance with law.
8. The petitioner shall produce adequate evidence to establish compliance with all other statutory requirements, except the time limit prescribed under Section 16 of the GST enactments. If the petitioner satisfies the same, the respondent shall drop the proceedings.
9. Failing which, liberty is granted to the respondent to pass appropriate orders on merits in accordance with law.
10. This writ petition is disposed of with the above observations. No costs. Consequently, the connected W.M.Ps. are closed.
Category: GST

About CA Satbir Singh

Chartered Accountant having 12+ years of Experience in Taxation , Finance and GST related matters and can be reached at Email : Taxheal@gmail.com