An Assessment Order Passed Against a Non-Filer Stands Deemed Withdrawn Upon Filing a Valid Return

By | May 16, 2026

An Assessment Order Passed Against a Non-Filer Stands Deemed Withdrawn Upon Filing a Valid Return


Issue

Whether a best-judgment assessment order passed under Section 62(1) against a non-filer of GST returns, along with its recovery and garnishee proceedings, stands automatically withdrawn by virtue of the deeming clause in Section 62(2) if the taxpayer subsequently files a valid return along with the requisite tax, interest, and late fees.


Facts

  • The petitioner failed to file their statutory GST return for the tax period of April 2024.

  • Due to this non-filing, the Revenue authorities passed a best-judgment assessment order under Section 62 on June 20, 2024, and issued a summary of the demand in Form GST DRC-07 on June 21, 2024.

  • On December 2, 2024, the petitioner filed a valid return for the said period, paying all applicable tax, interest, and late fees.

  • Despite the return being filed, the Revenue initiated tax recovery actions and garnishee bank attachments based on the initial best-judgment assessment order.

  • The petitioner challenged the recovery actions, arguing that the filing of the valid return triggered the statutory deeming clause under Section 62(2), rendering the assessment order automatically withdrawn.

  • The Respondent authorities, upon verifying their records, confirmed to the Court that the valid return had been filed and no dues remained pending on account of that return.


Decision

  • The High Court allowed the writ petition, ruling entirely in favor of the petitioner.

  • The Court held that by virtue of the explicit deeming provision contained in Section 62(2) of the Act, the best-judgment assessment order dated June 20, 2024, and its summary demand dated June 21, 2024, stood automatically “deemed withdrawn” the moment the valid return was filed with tax, interest, and late fees.

  • It was ruled that because the underlying assessment order ceased to exist in the eyes of the law, any recovery proceedings founded upon that order could no longer be legally pursued.

  • Consequently, the Court set aside and quashed all coercive recovery actions, including the garnishee bank attachments initiated against the petitioner.


Key Takeaways

Automatic Statutory Drop of Best-Judgment Orders: Section 62(2) contains a powerful, self-executing deeming clause. Once a non-filer files a valid return (along with interest and late fees under Sections 47 and 50) within the permissible time frame, the best-judgment order dies a natural legal death without requiring a formal cancellation order from the officer.

Recovery Actions Cannot Survive Deemed Withdrawal: Because the original assessment order stands completely withdrawn, any consequential recovery actions—such as bank attachments or garnishee notices under Section 79—lose their legal foundation and become entirely void.

Compliance Cures Default: The statutory scheme deliberately provides a remedial window to non-filers, prioritizing regular tax compliance and actual revenue collection over the continuation of ad-hoc, estimated best-judgment assessments.

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
Shah and Shahi Foreign Trade (OPC) (P.) Ltd.
v.
Deputy Assistant Commissioneri ST*
R. Raghunandan Rao and T.C.D. Sekhar, JJ.
WRIT PETITION NO. 13451 of 2026
MAY  6, 2026
C. Sanjeeva Rao for the Petitioner.
ORDER
R. Raghunandan Rao, J. – Heard Sri C. Sanjeeva Rao, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Commercial Tax, appearing for the respondents.
2. The petitioner had suffered an order of assessment, dated 20.06.2024, and the summary of the order, in FORM GST DRC -07, dated 21.06.2024, for the tax period, April-2024, passed under Section 62 of the Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’). After the said orders had been passed, the petitioner had filed his returns on 02.12.2024, along with tax, interest and late fee.
3. The petitioner has now approached this Court, by way of this Writ Petition, being aggrieved by the recovery sought to be made, on the basis of the aforesaid order, dated 20.06.2024.
4. Sri C. Sanjeeva Rao, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, would contend that the order of assessment passed, on 20.06.2024, to be deemed to have been withdrawn, on account of Section 62(2) of the Act, which states that any order passed under Section 62 of the Act, would be deemed to have been withdrawn, if the returns, for the said period have been filed, in accordance with Law, under Section 62 of the Act.
5. The learned Government Pleader for Commercial Taxes, appearing for the respondents, on instructions, submits that, the petitioner had infact filed the returns, on 02.12.2024, and no dues are pending, on account of the said returns.
6. In view of the deeming provision, under Section 62(2) of the Act, this Writ Petition is disposed of, with a declaration that the order of assessment, dated 20.06.2024 and the summary of the order, dated 21.06.2024, are deemed to have been withdrawn, and that, the respondents cannot seek to recover any amounts raised, under the said orders.
7. It may also be observed that consequent to this order, any order of attachment to Garnishee would also stand set aside. There shall be no order as to costs.
8. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed.
Category: GST

About CA Satbir Singh

Chartered Accountant having 12+ years of Experience in Taxation , Finance and GST related matters and can be reached at Email : Taxheal@gmail.com