IMPORTANT GST CASE LAWS 18.03.2026
| Relevant Act | Section | Case Law Title / Authority | Brief Summary | Citation |
| CGST Act, 2017 | Section 50 & 74 | Geena Garments v. State Tax Officer | Interest under Sec 50(3) is mandatory for belated payment of ineligible ITC. Debiting an insufficient Electronic Credit Ledger via DRC-03 does not mitigate interest or penalty liabilities. | Click Here |
| CGST Act, 2017 | Section 67 | Goal Closures v. State Tax Officer | Prohibition/Seizure orders must be lifted once the assessment is quashed on limitation, especially if there was no proposal for confiscation in the original show cause notice. | Click Here |
| CGST Act, 2017 | Section 69 | Gautam Kumar v. State of Bihar | Anticipatory bail granted to a person who filed Nil returns under a bona fide arrangement. A condition was imposed that the petitioner not engage in GST practice during the trial. | Click Here |
| CGST Act, 2017 | Section 107 | Fratelli Vineyards Ltd. v. West Bengal | An appellate order that merely “paraphrases” the original order without independent examination of the taxpayer’s documents shows a non-application of mind and must be remanded. | Click Here |
| CGST Act, 2017 | Section 129 | Golden Traders v. DAC of State Tax | Transit State Jurisdiction: Officers in a state through which goods are merely passing cannot seize them for alleged evasion; such jurisdiction lies with the destination state. | Click Here |
| CGST Act, 2017 | Section 129 | Golden Traders v. DAC of State Tax | Valuation at Check-post: Goods cannot be detained for “under-valuation” at a check-post. This is a matter for the jurisdictional assessing authority, not the transit officer. | Click Here |
| CGST Act, 2017 | Section 129 | Gopal Enterprises v. Chief Commissioner | Interim release of perishable goods (Areca nut dust) and the vehicle was allowed upon deposit of the penalty, balancing revenue interest with the risk of corrosion/decay. | Click Here |
For More :- Read IMPORTANT GST CASE LAWS 17.03.2026