IMPORTANT GST CASE LAWS 27.03.2026
| Relevant Act | Section | Case Law Title / Authority | Brief Summary | Citation |
| CGST Act, 2017 | Section 9 | Easy Flux Polymers (P.) Ltd., In re | Biodegradable Bags: Following Notification 9/2025-CT, certified biodegradable bags attract a concessional 5% GST (Entry 319). Non-biodegradable plastic bags remain under the standard higher rate. | Click Here |
| CGST Act, 2017 | Section 29 | Om Enterprises v. Union of India | Vague Notices: Registration cannot be cancelled using “cyclostyled” (template-based) notices that fail to specify actual defects. Such mechanical exercise of power is unsustainable. | Click Here |
| CGST Act, 2017 | Section 73 | Pharma Trading Corp. v. West Bengal | Excess ITC demands must contain specific particulars. Unreasoned orders passed without a hearing are invalid, especially when the Department unilaterally debits the Credit Ledger. | Click Here |
| CGST Act, 2017 | Section 74 | Roshan Sharma v. Deputy Commissioner | Fastag Data as Evidence: The SC directed the Appellate Authority to consider Fastag data to prove the genuineness of goods movement, emphasizing that the Department must cooperate in providing such data. | Click Here |
| CGST Act, 2017 | Section 107 | Orsu Yadaiah v. GSTN | Mandatory Pre-deposit: There is no exemption from the statutory pre-deposit for filing a first appeal, even if the tax was paid during adjudication or the penalty is disputed. | Click Here |
| CGST Act, 2017 | Section 129 | Pacific Cyber Technology v. Gujarat | Transit Delays: Detention of goods is invalid if the officer ignores the taxpayer’s explanation regarding transporter faults or breakdown. A “speaking order” is a mandatory requirement. | Click Here |
| CGST Act, 2017 | Section 169 | Phuljhora Agro Plantation v. UOI | Ex-parte orders passed without proof of service of notice are a gross violation of natural justice. Such assessments must be quashed for a fresh hearing. | Click Here |
For More :- Read IMPORTANT GST CASE LAWS 25.03.2026