Important Income Tax Case Laws 30.04.2026
| Relevant Act | Section | Case Law Title | Citation | Brief Summary |
| Income Tax | Sec 2(14) | Rashmi Niranjan Mehta v. ITO | Click Here | Sale of gold/silver received as Streedhan is treatable as Capital Gains (eligible for Sec 54F) if item-wise acquisition and vouchers are substantiated on remand. |
| Income Tax | Sec 10(10AA) | Gyanendra Panwar v. ADIT | Click Here | Leave Encashment: Exemption limit for non-government employees is Rs. 25 lakhs per CBDT Notification 31/2023; restricting it to Rs. 3 lakhs is incorrect. |
| Income Tax | Sec 10(10AA) | Bindumadavan Prakash v. ITO | Click Here | Employees retiring from BSNL (formerly with DoT) are treated as Government Employees; leave encashment is fully exempt without monetary limits. |
| Income Tax | Sec 12A / 12AB | Vriksh Be The Change v. ITO | Click Here | Registration can be refused if the trust deed permits spending income/benefits outside India, as exemption is limited to charitable activities within India. |
| Income Tax | Sec 24 / 80C | Rashmi Niranjan Mehta v. ITO | Click Here | Joint owners can claim housing loan deductions even if the loan is in the spouse’s name, subject to verification of the actual investment source. |
| Income Tax | Sec 37(1) | Morgan Stanley Advantage Services v. NFAC | Click Here | ESOP Cost: Recharged cost of overseas group company shares allotted to employees is allowable as revenue expenditure, as the value is taxed as a perquisite. |
| Black Money Act | Sec 51 | Deepak Talwar v. ITO | Click Here | Placing previously unavailable foreign asset documents (KYC, Trust records) on record at the pre-charge evidence stage is legally permissible. |
| Income Tax | Sec 54F / 70 | Nikesh Bhagwandas Mehta v. ITO | Click Here | Sec 54F exemption applies to the entire LTCG; assessee can carry forward LTCL without setting it off against the exempt gain. |
| Income Tax | Sec 69A | Bath Affair v. ITO | Click Here | Sec 69A (Unexplained Money) cannot be invoked for amounts already recorded in books and supported by VAT returns. |
| Income Tax | Sec 92C | Morgan Stanley Advantage Services v. NFAC | Click Here | Margin agreed upon in a Bilateral APA (BAPA) for US affiliates is applicable to UK affiliates if the nature of the transaction is identical. |
| Income Tax | Sec 276C | Ritu Butalia v. State | Click Here | Fair Trial: In prosecution for tax evasion, the accused has the right to inspect original foreign documents during cross-examination. |
For More :- Read Important Income Tax Case Laws 29.04.2026
