Important Income Tax Case Laws 29.04.2026
| Relevant Act | Section | Case Law Title | Citation | Brief Summary |
| Income Tax | Sec 2(1A) | Bombay Super Hybrid Seeds Ltd. v. DCIT/ACIT | Click Here | Seed Production: Income from hybrid seeds produced on leased land under company supervision is “Agricultural Income,” not business income. |
| Income Tax | Sec 2(22)(e) | Ashwinikumar Ramkumar Poddar v. ACIT | Click Here | Deemed Dividend: In a running account, interest accrued during credit periods must be set off against debit balances before computing deemed dividend. |
| Income Tax | Sec 10(4) | Abhinav Jain v. Income-tax Officer | Click Here | NRE Interest: Exemption requires proof of RBI permission for the account; failure to produce documentation makes reassessment valid. |
| Income Tax | Sec 11 | Vanita Samaj v. Income-tax Officer | Click Here | Trust Income: Letting out property or earning royalty for charitable purposes is not “commercial activity” per se; exemption is allowable. |
| Income Tax | Sec 37(1) | Tata Motors Body Solutions Ltd. v. DCIT | Click Here | Defined Benefits: Provisions for unfunded employee schemes based on actuarial valuation (Ind AS 19) are “ascertained liabilities” and fully deductible. |
| Income Tax | Sec 40(a)(i) | Tata Motors Body Solutions Ltd. v. DCIT | Click Here | TDS Disallowance: Provisions for salary (TDS u/s 192) and purchases are not subject to disallowance at the “provisioning” stage; remanded for verification. |
| Income Tax | Sec 48 | Kailas Kalyan Creators (P.) Ltd. v. ITO | Click Here | Encroachment: Compensation paid to encroachers to vacate land is a valid “Cost of Improvement” for computing Capital Gains. |
| Income Tax | Sec 69B | M. Ravindran v. Income-tax Officer | Click Here | Undisclosed Investment: Addition is justified if the DVO’s estimate reveals higher investment than disclosed, following rejection of faulty books. |
| Income Tax | Sec 80-IA | JSW Energy Ltd. v. ACIT | Click Here | Infrastructure: Deduction must be computed on the aggregate profits; losses of all eligible units must be set off before claiming the deduction. |
| Income Tax | Sec 92C | JSW Energy Ltd. v. ACIT | Click Here | TP – Power: ALP for captive power sales should be the selling tariff of the distribution licensee, not the lower purchase rate of the State utility. |
| Income Tax | Sec 143 / 153A | Triple S. Stock and Shares (P.) Ltd. v. Delhi | Click Here | Assessment Merger: An original assessment u/s 143(3) merges into a subsequent search assessment u/s 153A, which becomes the prevailing order. |
| Income Tax | Sec 145B(3) | Bando India (P.) Ltd. v. Income-tax Officer | Click Here | Duty Drawback: Explicitly taxable on a receipt basis only; AO cannot tax it on an accrual basis. |
| Income Tax | Sec 194-IA | Artha Real Estate Corp. Ltd. v. DCIT | Click Here | TDS Default: TDS must be deducted on the entire consideration of immovable property; partial deduction leads to “assessee-in-default” status. |
For More :- Read Important Income Tax Case Laws 28.04.2026
