Important Income Tax Case Laws 27.04.2026
| Relevant Act | Section | Case Law Title | Citation | Brief Summary |
| Income Tax | Sec 4 / 145 | Ghanshyam Infrastructure (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT | Click Here | Contractual Receipts: Assessable in the year profit is offered if records fail to prove reflection in earlier returns. 8% net profit rate upheld as AO failed to justify 12% estimation. |
| Income Tax | Sec 32 | CIT-LTU v. Tata Motors Ltd. | Click Here | Depreciation: (SC Dismissal) Assessee is entitled to claim depreciation on assets that have been leased out to others. |
| Income Tax | Sec 37(1) | SPS Construction India (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT | Click Here | Bogus Purchases: Purchases cannot be treated as non-genuine based solely on employee statements if substantiated by invoices, weighbridge slips, and bank records. |
| Income Tax | Sec 43B | Schlumberger Solutions (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT | Click Here | Service Tax Liability: No disallowance u/s 43B if the unpaid liability was not routed through the P&L account or claimed as a deduction. |
| Income Tax | Sec 69A | SPS Construction India (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT | Click Here | Unexplained Money: Additions based on vague third-party survey statements or seized registers without specific linkage to the assessee are unsustainable. |
| Income Tax | Sec 80-IA | SPS Construction India (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT | Click Here | Infrastructure Developer: EPC/Turnkey contractors with complete responsibility (design, procurement, risk-bearing) are “Developers” eligible for deduction. |
| Income Tax | Sec 92C | Unilever Industries (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT | Click Here | TP – Pass-through Costs: Costs recovered from AEs on a pure cost-to-cost basis (no markup/value add) must be excluded from the operating base for PLI. |
| Income Tax | Sec 115JAA | SPS Construction India (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT | Click Here | MAT Credit: AO must verify and compute the correct MAT credit if brought forward figures were misstated due to clerical errors. |
| Income Tax | Sec 147 | Ghanshyam Infrastructure (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT | Click Here | Reassessment: Validly initiated u/s 148 where substantial contractual receipts are reflected in Form 26AS but no return of income was filed. |
| Income Tax | Sec 271DA | MSN Laboratories (P.) Ltd. v. Addl. CIT | Click Here | Penalty Limitation: Limitation for Sec 271DA is reckoned from the date the AO refers the case to the JCIT, not the date of the JCIT’s show-cause notice. |
For More :- Read Important Income Tax Case Laws 25.04.2026
