Important Income Tax Case Laws 27.04.2026

By | April 29, 2026

Important Income Tax Case Laws 27.04.2026

Relevant Act Section Case Law Title Citation Brief Summary
Income Tax Sec 4 / 145 Ghanshyam Infrastructure (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT Click Here Contractual Receipts: Assessable in the year profit is offered if records fail to prove reflection in earlier returns. 8% net profit rate upheld as AO failed to justify 12% estimation.
Income Tax Sec 32 CIT-LTU v. Tata Motors Ltd. Click Here Depreciation: (SC Dismissal) Assessee is entitled to claim depreciation on assets that have been leased out to others.
Income Tax Sec 37(1) SPS Construction India (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT Click Here Bogus Purchases: Purchases cannot be treated as non-genuine based solely on employee statements if substantiated by invoices, weighbridge slips, and bank records.
Income Tax Sec 43B Schlumberger Solutions (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT Click Here Service Tax Liability: No disallowance u/s 43B if the unpaid liability was not routed through the P&L account or claimed as a deduction.
Income Tax Sec 69A SPS Construction India (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT Click Here Unexplained Money: Additions based on vague third-party survey statements or seized registers without specific linkage to the assessee are unsustainable.
Income Tax Sec 80-IA SPS Construction India (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT Click Here Infrastructure Developer: EPC/Turnkey contractors with complete responsibility (design, procurement, risk-bearing) are “Developers” eligible for deduction.
Income Tax Sec 92C Unilever Industries (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT Click Here TP – Pass-through Costs: Costs recovered from AEs on a pure cost-to-cost basis (no markup/value add) must be excluded from the operating base for PLI.
Income Tax Sec 115JAA SPS Construction India (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT Click Here MAT Credit: AO must verify and compute the correct MAT credit if brought forward figures were misstated due to clerical errors.
Income Tax Sec 147 Ghanshyam Infrastructure (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT Click Here Reassessment: Validly initiated u/s 148 where substantial contractual receipts are reflected in Form 26AS but no return of income was filed.
Income Tax Sec 271DA MSN Laboratories (P.) Ltd. v. Addl. CIT Click Here Penalty Limitation: Limitation for Sec 271DA is reckoned from the date the AO refers the case to the JCIT, not the date of the JCIT’s show-cause notice.

For More :- Read Important Income Tax Case Laws 25.04.2026