Best-judgment assessment stands deemed withdrawn automatically once a non-filer subsequently furnishes valid tax returns.

By | May 28, 2026

Best-judgment assessment stands deemed withdrawn automatically once a non-filer subsequently furnishes valid tax returns.

Issue

Whether a best-judgment assessment order and its consequential recovery proceedings can legally survive after a non-filer subsequently files the outstanding returns with applicable tax, interest, and late fees under Section 62(2) of the CGST/APGST Act.

Facts

  • The Assessment: The petitioner-assessee was assessed under a best-judgment assessment via an order dated July 20, 2024, accompanied by a demand summary in FORM GST DRC-07 for the tax period of May 2024 due to a failure to file regular returns.

  • Delayed Filing: The petitioner subsequently filed the outstanding returns for the said period on December 2, 2024, along with the full payment of due tax, interest, and late fees.

  • Coercive Recovery: Prior to the filing of these returns, the tax authorities had already initiated coercive recovery measures and issued garnishee attachments based on the original best-judgment demand.

  • Writ Petition Filed: The assessee approached the High Court seeking a stay on the recovery actions, invoking the statutory protection of Section 62(2) which mandates the “deemed withdrawal” of best-judgment assessments upon late filing.

  • Department’s Admission: The respondents confirmed to the Court that the returns were successfully furnished on December 2, 2024, and explicitly stated that no outstanding tax dues remained on record for that period.

Decision

  • Deemed Withdrawal Enforced: The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that by virtue of the legal fiction created under Section 62(2), the original best-judgment assessment order and the DRC-07 summary stood automatically withdrawn the moment the returns were furnished.

  • Extinguishment of Demands: The Court declared that since the underlying tax demand was legally extinguished by operation of law, the tax department possessed no authority to pursue recovery.

  • Garnishee Orders Quashed: Consequently, the Court set aside and cancelled all consequential garnishee bank attachments initiated by the respondents.

Key Takeaways

  • Automatic Statutory Relief: Section 62(2) operates as an absolute deeming fiction. Once a non-filer complies by filing the pending returns and clearing the interest and late fees, the best-judgment assessment order dissolves automatically without requiring a formal cancellation order from the tax officer.

  • Immediate Cessation of Recovery: Tax authorities cannot continue or initiate bank attachments or garnishee actions once the delayed returns are validated on the portal. The survival of recovery proceedings is strictly contingent upon an active, non-extinguished demand.

  • Time-Bound Protection: While this statutory mechanism completely wipes away the best-judgment order, taxpayers must ensure they file the missing returns within the specific statutory window prescribed under Section 62 to successfully trigger the automatic withdrawal.

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
Shah and Shahi Foreign Trade (OPC) (P.) Ltd.
v.
Deputy Assistant Commissioner*
R RAGHUNANDAN RAO and T.C.D. Sekhar, JJ.
WRIT PETITION NO. 13462 OF 2026
MAY  6, 2026
C Sanjeeva Rao for the Petitioner.
ORDER
1. Heard Sri C. Sanjeeva Rao, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Commercial Taxes, appearing for the respondents.
2. The petitioner had suffered an order of assessment, dated 20.07.2024, and the summary of the order, in FORM GST DRC – 07, dated 23.07.2024, for the tax period, May, 2024, passed under Section 62 of the Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’). After the said orders had been passed, the petitioner had filed his returns, on 02.12.2024, along with tax, interest and late fee.
3. The petitioner has now approached this Court, by way of this Writ Petition, being aggrieved by the recovery sought to be made, on the basis of the aforesaid order, dated 20.07.2024.
4. Sri C. Sanjeeva Rao, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, would contend that the order of assessment passed, on 20.07.2024, to be deemed to have been withdrawn, on account of Section 62(2) of the Act, which states that any order passed under Section 62 of the Act, would be deemed to have been withdrawn, if the returns, for the said period have been filed, in accordance with Law, under Section 62 of the Act.
5. The learned Government Pleader for Commercial Taxes, appearing for the respondents, on instructions, submits that, the petitioner had infact filed the returns, on 02.12.2024, and no dues are pending, on account of the said returns.
6. In view of the deeming provision, under Section 62(2) of the Act, this Writ Petition is disposed of, with a declaration that the order of assessment, dated 20.07.2024 and the summary of the order, dated 23.07.2024, are deemed to have been withdrawn, and that, the respondents cannot seek to recover any amounts raised, under the said orders.
7. It may also be observed that consequent to this order, any order of attachment to Garnishee would also stand set aside.
There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed.
Category: GST