Uploading a show cause notice solely on the GST portal after registration cancellation is invalid.

By | May 29, 2026

Uploading a show cause notice solely on the GST portal after registration cancellation is invalid.

Issue

Whether uploading a Show Cause Notice (SCN) for tax determination exclusively on the GST portal constitutes valid legal service under Section 169 of the CGST Act once a taxpayer’s registration has already been cancelled, and whether an order passed pursuant to such service violates the principles of natural justice.

Facts

  • The petitioner was a registered person under the GST regime whose registration was formally cancelled in June 2018.

  • Following the cancellation of the registration, the petitioner completely ceased operations and carried out no further business activities.

  • The Revenue subsequently initiated tax determination proceedings and served an SCN to the petitioner solely by uploading it onto the automated GST portal.

  • In April 2024, Respondent No. 2 passed a final tax determination order based on the portal-uploaded notice.

  • The petitioner filed a writ petition before the High Court challenging the legal validity of the service and alleging a total breach of natural justice.

Decision

  • Held, that once a taxpayer’s GST registration stands cancelled, they are under no legal obligation or statutory duty to continuously log in and check the GST portal for updates.

  • Held, that service of an SCN post-cancellation must be served using alternative modes of communication under Section 169 to ensure the taxpayer actually receives it.

  • Held, that merely uploading a notice to the portal of a cancelled entity does not constitute valid or proper service for initiating fresh assessment proceedings.

  • Held, that because the notice was not legally served, the subsequent proceedings suffered from a fatal violation of the principles of natural justice.

  • Held, that the impugned tax determination order is quashed in full, with liberty granted to the department to issue a fresh notice through a valid mode of communication.

Key Takeaways

  • No Duty to Monitor Post-Cancellation: The legal expectation to regularly monitor the ‘View Additional Notices’ tab or dashboard on the GST portal ends once a registration is cancelled by the department or surrendered.

  • Portal Service is Conditional: While electronic portal service is standard for active taxpayers, it cannot be used as a blind default for closed businesses where actual delivery of notice must be practically ensured.

  • Jurisdictional Defect: Failing to properly serve a statutory notice under Section 169 is a jurisdictional error that invalidates all subsequent assessment and recovery orders.

HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
AWE Global Logistics
v.
State of U.P.*
Shekhar B. Saraf and ABDHESH KUMAR CHAUDHARY, JJ.
WRIT TAX No. 748 of 2026
MAY  15, 2026
Anit Vishal Srivastav and Ramesh Chandra Srivastava for the Petitioner.
ORDER
1. Heard Shri Anit Vishal Srivastav, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Sanjay Sarin, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State as well as perused the record.
2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated April 30, 2024 passed by the respondent No.2/ Assistant Commissioner, Lucknow, Sector-1, Lucknow (A) Lucknow I, State Tax, U.P., under Section 73 of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”).
3. Factual matrix in the matter is that the petitioner’s registration under the Act was cancelled on June 1, 2018. Subsequent to the same, no business was carried out by the petitioner. It appears that a show cause notice was uploaded on the GST portal and subsequent to the same, the order impugned was passed under Section 73 of the Act.
4. Once the registration has been cancelled, the petitioner is not obligated to check GST portal. The mode of service of any show cause notice has to be by way of alternative means to the petitioner.
5. Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner relies upon an order passed by the coordinate Bench of this Court in Katyal Industries v. State of U.P. Neutral Citation No.2024:AHC:23697-DB. We are essentially in agreement with the said principle enunciated by the coordinate Bench in the said order.
6. We find that there has been violation of the principle of natural justice, and accordingly, the impugned order dated April 30, 2024 passed by the respondent No.2 is quashed and set aside. The department shall be at liberty to issue a proper notice to the petitioner and act in accordance with law.
7. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of.
Category: GST