Writ Petitions Are Not Maintainable When Statutory Appeal Remedy Under Section 107 Is Available

By | June 27, 2026

Writ Petitions Are Not Maintainable When Statutory Appeal Remedy Under Section 107 Is Available

Writ Petitions Are Not Maintainable When Statutory Appeal Remedy Under Section 107 Is Available

Issue

Whether a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India can be maintained when an alternative, efficacious statutory remedy of appeal is available under Section 107 of the CGST/RGST Act, 2017.

Facts

  • The assessees bypassed the regular statutory appellate channel and filed writ petitions directly before the High Court.

  • A statutory remedy of appeal before the Appellate Authority under Section 107 of the GST Act was actively available to the assessees at the time of filing.

  • The matters were placed before the High Court specifically to evaluate whether the writ petitions were maintainable given this alternative remedy.

  • The High Court dismissed the writ petitions, recognizing the clear availability of the Section 107 remedy, but granted the assessees liberty to file regular appeals on all factual and legal grounds.

  • Aggrieved by the High Court’s refusal to entertain their writs, the assessees filed a Special Leave Petition (SLP) before the Supreme Court.

Decision

  • High Court’s refusal upheld: The Supreme Court expressed no inclination to interfere with the final order of the High Court, affirming that writ jurisdiction should not substitute a statutory appeal.

  • Extension of time granted: While dismissing the assessees’ SLP, the Court extended the timeline by an additional two weeks to allow them to file their appeals under Section 107 in line with the liberty granted below.

  • Final Ruling: The SLP was dismissed in favor of the revenue, confirming that the assessees must exhaust the statutory appeal route.

Key Takeaways

  • Exhaustion of Alternative Remedies: High Courts and the Supreme Court will strictly enforce the rule of alternative remedies in tax matters; a writ petition cannot be used to bypass the standard appellate framework established by the GST Act.

  • Protection of Merits via Remand: When a writ petition is dismissed strictly on grounds of maintainability, the courts typically preserve the taxpayer’s rights by granting them liberty to present all factual and legal arguments before the appropriate statutory authority.

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Chetan Cabletronices (P.) Ltd.
v.
Union of India
Dipankar DattaSatish Chandra Sharma and Sanjeev Sachdeva, JJ.
SLP Appeal (C) No(s).19608 of 2026
JUNE  2, 2026
Prabhat KumarSamarth SinghUtkarsh Kumar, Advs. and Ms. Alpana Sharma, AOR for the Petitioner.
ORDER
1. We are not inclined to interfere with the impugned judgment and order of the High Court; hence, the special leave petition is dismissed.
2. However, time to file the appeal under Section 107 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 in terms of the liberty granted by the High Court is extended by two weeks from date.
3. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.