GST Case Law 07.07.2026

By | July 9, 2026

GST Case Law 07.07.2026

Relevant Act Section Case Law Title Citation Brief Summary
Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 N/A (Classification / Notification No. 9/2025) Sapna Hitech (P.) Ltd., In re Click Here ‘Pooja oil’ (inedible mixture of 99% palm/rice bran/soya oil and 1% sesame oil) marketed as ‘not for human consumption’ is classifiable under Heading 1518 and attracts 5% tax.
Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 16 Med Serve v. State of Kerala Click Here Rejection of ITC on grounds of time-bar is unsustainable if the returns for Dec 2018 to Mar 2019 were filed within the statutorily extended window; authority must reconsider the claim.
Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 29 Mahadevappa v. Principal Chief Commissioner of Central Tax Click Here A domestic dispute over premise authority between spouses does not oust the statutory mechanism for GST registration; the petitioner must use the Section 107 appellate remedy instead of writ jurisdiction.
Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 29 Nitish Das v. State of Assam Click Here Liberty granted to apply for restoration of a cancelled GST registration (due to non-filing) even after statutory timelines lapsed, subject to the assessee filing all pending returns and paying full tax, interest, and late fees.
Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 75 Shivani Enterprise v. Union of India Click Here Writ petition rejected as no breach of natural justice was established; minor errors/misdescriptions in the SCN for fraudulent ITC were merely typographical and relevant documents were available.
Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 160 Marella Siva Narayana v. Assistant Commissioner of State Tax Click Here An unsigned GST assessment order is legally invalid. A physical or digital signature is a mandatory requirement, and curative or service provisions under Section 160 cannot validate an unsigned order.