Supreme Court Dismisses Revenue SLP Affirming High Court Ruling Favouring Insurance Assessee Across Issues

By | August 13, 2026

Supreme Court Dismisses Revenue SLP Affirming High Court Ruling Favouring Insurance Assessee Across Issues

Supreme Court Dismisses Revenue SLP Affirming High Court Ruling Favouring Insurance Assessee Across Issues

Issues

  1. Applicability of Disallowance Under Section 14A: Whether Section 14A applies to the computation of profits and gains of general insurance businesses under Section 44 read with Rule 5 of the First Schedule.
  2. TDS on Reinsurance Premium & Permanent Establishment (PE): Whether payments made to non-resident reinsurers (NRRs) through independent brokers require tax deduction at source under Section 195/Section 40(a)(i), or if brokers constitute a PE/Business Connection under Section 9 or Article 5 of the relevant DTAA.
  3. Taxability of Profit on Sale of Investments: Whether profits derived from the sale of investments by an insurance company are taxable under the Income-tax Act.
  4. Applicability of Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT): Whether the provisions of Section 115JB regarding computation of book profit apply to insurance companies.
  5. TDS on Reinsurance Commission Under Section 194D: Whether an insurance company is liable to deduct tax at source on commission paid to other insurance companies for receiving reinsurance premiums.
  6. TDS on Survey Fees Paid Overseas: Whether TDS is deductible under Section 195 on survey fees paid to non-resident surveyors for services rendered entirely outside India.
  7. Depreciation Rate on Uninterruptible Power Supply (UPS): Whether UPS systems qualify for higher depreciation at 60% as computer accessories or are restricted to 15% as general plant and machinery.

Facts

  • The assessee, an insurance company carrying on general insurance and reinsurance operations, was assessed for multiple Assessment Years spanning AY 2005-06 to AY 2014-15.
  • Section 14A Expenditure: The Assessing Officer attempted to apply Section 14A disallowances to exempt income earned in the course of insurance operations.
  • Reinsurance Payments & TDS: The assessee remitted payments to non-resident reinsurers (NRRs) through independent intermediary brokers without deducting TDS. The Assessing Officer disallowed these expenses under Section 40(a)(i) citing non-compliance with Section 195.
  • Profits from Investments: The Assessing Officer sought to tax gains derived from the sale of investments made by the insurance enterprise.
  • MAT Application: The Revenue invoked Section 115JB to levy Minimum Alternate Tax on the book profits of the insurance company.
  • Reinsurance Commission & Survey Fees: The assessee made payments toward reinsurance commissions to other insurance entities and survey fees to non-resident surveyors operating outside India without withholding tax at source under Sections 194D and 195, respectively.
  • Depreciation on UPS: The assessee claimed depreciation at 60% on UPS systems, treating them as integral components/accessories of computer systems. The Assessing Officer reduced this rate to 15%, treating UPS as general plant and machinery.
  • Appellate Hierarchy: The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) ruled in favour of the assessee on all issues. Upon appeal by the Department, the High Court upheld the ITAT’s findings. The Revenue subsequently filed a Special Leave Petition (SLP) before the Supreme Court.

Decision

  • SLP Dismissed: The Supreme Court found no grounds for interference with the impugned judgment of the High Court and dismissed the Revenue’s Special Leave Petition on all accounts, deciding all issues in favour of the assessee.
  • Section 14A Disallowance Inapplicable: The methodology for computing insurance profits under Section 44 read with Rule 5 of the First Schedule operates as a special self-contained code. It explicitly excludes the application of Section 14A and general computation provisions under Sections 28 to 43B.
  • No TDS Obligation on Payments to NRRs: Independent brokers function strictly as facilitators and do not constitute a Business Connection under Section 9(1)(i) or a Permanent Establishment under Article 5 of the DTAA. Hence, payments to NRRs attract no TDS under Section 195, preventing disallowance under Section 40(a)(i).
  • Capital Gains on Investments Exempt: Profits earned by an insurance enterprise on the sale of investments are not taxable.
  • Section 115JB Inapplicable to Insurance Entities: Minimum Alternate Tax provisions under Section 115JB do not apply to insurance entities.
  • No TDS Under Section 194D on Reinsurance Commission: The insurance company is not required to deduct TDS under Section 194D on commission paid to other insurance companies for receiving reinsurance premiums (following CIT v. Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance Co.).
  • No TDS on Overseas Survey Services: Survey fees paid to non-resident surveyors for services rendered wholly outside India fall outside Indian tax jurisdiction; hence, no TDS under Section 195 is applicable.
  • UPS Eligible for 60% Depreciation: Following established precedents (T.V. Sundaram Iyengar & Sons Ltd. v. CIT), UPS systems qualify for depreciation at the rate of 60%.

Key Takeaways

  • Special Provisions Prevail: Section 44 and the First Schedule act as an exclusive Code for computing insurance profits, barring general provisions like Section 14A and Section 115JB (MAT).
  • Independent Intermediaries Do Not Create PE: Intermediary brokers operating as independent facilitators do not establish a PE or Business Connection for non-resident entities in India.
  • Extraterritorial Services Exempt from TDS: Fees paid to non-resident service providers (e.g., surveyors) for technical or factual services rendered entirely outside Indian territorial boundaries do not attract TDS under Section 195.
  • Classification of UPS: UPS units are legally recognized as computer accessories, making them eligible for the standard accelerated depreciation rate of 60%.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Principal Commissioner of Income-tax
v.
Cholamandalam
PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA and ALOK ARADHE, JJ.
SLP (CIVIL) Diary No(s). 38047 OF 2026
JULY  27, 2026
Raghavendra P. Shankar, A.S.G., Sudarshan Lamba, AOR, Karan LahiriGaurav AryaVarad A. Kilor and Mrs. Alpana Sharma, Advs. for the Petitioner.
ORDER
1. Delay condoned.
2. We are not inclined to interfere with the impugned order in exercise of our jurisdiction under Article 136 of the Constitution of India.
3. The Special Leave Petition is, accordingly, dismissed and the accompanying interlocutory application(s), if any, stands disposed of.