High Court Can Condon Delay in Return Filing Despite CBDT Circular Time Limits
High Court Can Condon Delay in Return Filing Despite CBDT Circular Time Limits
Issue
Whether the High Court has the power to condone a delay in filing an income tax return under Section 119(2)(b) even after CBDT Circular No. 16/2024 prescribes a strict three-year limitation period.
Facts
-
Condonation Application: The assessee filed an application under Section 119(2)(b) seeking condonation of delay in filing its income tax return.
-
Rejection Order: The application for condonation of delay was rejected by the tax authority via an order dated September 8, 2025.
-
CBDT Circular Limit: The rejection relied on CBDT Circular No. 16/2024 (dated November 18, 2024), which sets a maximum three-year limitation period for filing delay condonation applications before subordinate tax authorities.
-
Reason for Delay: The assessee explained that the delay in filing the tax return occurred due to a delay in the submission of the statutory audit report.
-
Writ Challenge: The assessee challenged the rejection order before the High Court seeking condonation of delay.
Decision
-
High Court Authority Override: The High Court held that administrative circulars issued by the CBDT setting limitation periods do not restrict the constitutional power of the High Court to condone delay in appropriate cases.
-
Acceptance of Reason: The Court accepted the delay in receiving the statutory audit report as a genuine and sufficient cause for delayed return filing.
-
Conditional Relief: Subject to the assessee paying ₹15,000 as costs to the Adyar Cancer Institute, Chennai within two weeks, the impugned rejection order dated September 8, 2025, was set aside and the delay was condoned.
-
Outcome: Decided partly in favor of the assessee.
Key Takeaways
-
Judicial Review Over CBDT Circulars: CBDT circulars prescribing strict limitation periods (such as the 3-year limit in Circular 16/2024) bind subordinate administrative authorities, but they cannot curtail the High Court’s writ jurisdiction to grant equitable relief.
-
Delayed Audit as Valid Cause: Delay in completing and receiving a statutory audit report constitutes a legitimate ground for condoning delay in filing income tax returns.
-
Cost-Imposed Condonation: Courts can exercise discretion to condone procedural delays by compensating for delay through conditional costs paid to charitable institutions.
HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Arulmigu Gnanamalai Murugan Educational Trust
v.
Commissioner of Income-tax (Exemption)
Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy, J.
WP No. 13870 of 2026 W.M.P.Nos.15100 & 15103 of 2026 †
JULY 23, 2026
Ms. Hema Muralikrishnan for the Petitioner. V.J.Arul Raj, Senior Standing Counsel for the Respondent.
ORDER
1. An order dated 08.09.2025 rejecting the petitioner’s application to condone delay under Section 119(2)(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (I-T Act) is assailed in this writ petition.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is an educational trust. In view of the statutory audit report being made ready only on 30.12.2020, it is stated that the return of income could be filed only on 15.02.2022. Upon receiving demand notice dated 24.06.2025, it is stated that the petitioner replied thereto and thereafter filed the application to condone delay. Against the rejection order, she submits that an appeal was filed before the Income Tax Tribunal. Said appeal was rejected on the ground that an appeal would not lie against such order.
3. Mr.V.J.Arul Raj, learned senior standing counsel, appears on behalf of the respondent. He places reliance on Circular No.16/2024 dated 18.11.2024 and submits that the circular is binding on the Income Tax Department. He points out that such circular precludes the consideration of such application after the lapse of three years from the end of the relevant financial year.
4. Section 119(2)(b) of the I-T Act does not contain any restriction fettering the discretion of the Income Tax authority to condone delay. The petitioner is a charitable trust. The reason cited for delayed filing of returns is the delay in the submission of the statutory audit report. Undoubtedly, the petitioner has approached the Commissioner belatedly. Therefore, subject to the payment of a sum of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand only) as costs to the Adyar Cancer Institute, Chennai within two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, the order dated 08.09.2025 is set aside and the delay is condoned. Consequently, the second and third respondents are directed to give effect to this order and proceed further with the assessment on such basis.
5. This writ petition is disposed of on the above terms. Consequently, the connected writ miscellaneous petitions are closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

