| Section 7 |
D P Jain & Co. Infrastructure (P.) Ltd. v. Union of India |
Corporate guarantees executed for group entities without consideration by an infrastructure company not in the guarantee business do not constitute a supply. |
Click Here |
Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 |
| Section 9 |
Transafe Services Ltd. v. Superintendent of Central GST and Central Excise |
Following approval of a resolution plan and management transfer under CIRP, the taxpayer remains liable for GST liabilities arising post-CIRP initiation. |
Click Here |
Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 |
| Section 15 |
D P Jain & Co. Infrastructure (P.) Ltd. v. Union of India |
Constitutional validity of Rule 28(2) and related CBIC circulars on deemed valuation of corporate guarantees was upheld under the presumption of constitutionality for taxing statutes. |
Click Here |
Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 |
| Section 16 |
Ganesh Kumar Gopalan v. State Tax Officer |
ITC for October 2017 to March 2018 is allowable where returns were filed within the relaxed statutory timelines contemplated under Section 16(5). |
Click Here |
Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 |
| Section 16 |
Meethal Thotty Ahamedali v. State Tax Officer |
Writ petition challenging GSTR-3B vs 2A mismatch demand was dismissed due to inordinate delay and failure to respond to statutory notices in a timely manner. |
Click Here |
Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 |
| Section 17 |
Hiveloop Technology (P.) Ltd. v. Additional Director Directorate General of GST Intelligence |
Free promotional activities for one’s own platform do not constitute exempt supplies or Schedule I transactions; ITC reversal under Section 17(2) is not attracted. |
Click Here |
Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 |
| Section 29 |
Girivar Alloys (P.) Ltd. v. Commissioner Central GST and Central Excise Patna II |
Writ petition against GST registration cancellation is not maintainable when a reasoned order exists and an efficacious alternative statutory remedy is available. |
Click Here |
Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 |
| Section 29 |
Girivar Alloys (P.) Ltd. v. Commissioner Central GST and Central Excise Patna II |
Interim writ relief against the blocking of ITC via email during an ongoing investigation was refused to avoid interfering with investigative proceedings. |
Click Here |
Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 |
| Section 29 |
North Steel India v. Union of India |
SCN proposing cancellation of registration for non-existence and fake ITC is invalid if verification reports and material evidence are not shared with the assessee. |
Click Here |
Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 |
| Section 52 |
Hiveloop Technology (P.) Ltd. v. Additional Director Directorate General of GST Intelligence |
An e-commerce platform providing access only without collecting consideration or managing logistics/credit bears no TCS liability under Section 52. |
Click Here |
Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 |
| Section 62 |
Surya Sreebhavani Infrastructure (P.) Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner of State Tax |
Best judgment assessment orders stand deemed withdrawn under Section 62(2) upon the subsequent filing of valid GSTR-3B returns along with tax, interest, and late fees. |
Click Here |
Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 |
| Section 73 |
Transafe Services Ltd. v. Superintendent of Central GST and Central Excise |
Pre-CIRP statutory GST demands stand extinguished upon approval of an IBC resolution plan and cannot be recovered from the restructured entity. |
Click Here |
Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 |
| Section 73 |
Arunagiri Imports and Exports (P.) Ltd. v. State of Karnataka |
Ex parte demand order passed under Section 73(9) for unverified exempt turnover set aside and remitted back to ensure natural justice and an opportunity to contest. |
Click Here |
Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 |
| Section 74 |
Hiveloop Technology (P.) Ltd. v. Additional Director Directorate General of GST Intelligence |
Invocation of Section 74 is void without specific allegations and evidence of fraud, willful misstatement, or suppression against a person chargeable with tax. |
Click Here |
Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 |
| Section 74 |
Jagruteshwar Metals (P.) Ltd. v. Union of India |
Issuance of a single consolidated SCN clubbing multiple financial years is impermissible under GST law; separate year-wise notices are mandatory. |
Click Here |
Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 |
| Section 75 |
K.P Salih v. Assistant Commissioner of Central Tax and Central Excise |
Single composite notices and assessment orders spanning multiple years are invalid under the CGST framework, necessitating distinct year-wise proceedings. |
Click Here |
Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 |
| Section 79 |
Best Agrolife Ltd. v. State of Maharashtra |
Interim relief against bank recovery notices refused where the taxpayer delayed in approaching the court despite receiving prior notices under Rule 142 and Section 79. |
Click Here |
Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 |
| Section 107 |
Altec Fabricators v. Assistant Commissioner |
Appeal dismissed for a minor 7-day delay was restored upon compliance with the standard statutory 10% pre-deposit instead of the 25% imposed earlier. |
Click Here |
Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 |