| Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 |
Section 10 |
Tvl. Sahayarani Medicals v. Assistant Commissioner (ST) |
Click Here |
Benefit of enhanced turnover threshold under the composition scheme cannot be granted retrospectively prior to 01.04.2019 (Notification 14/2019). |
| Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 |
Section 13 |
P.C. Snehal Construction (P.) Ltd., In re |
Click Here |
Mobilisation advance adjustable against R.A. bills constitutes consideration for supply; GST is payable on receipt of advance based on time of supply rules. |
| Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 |
Section 16 |
MAC Industry v. Union of India |
Click Here |
Restrictions under Rule 96(10) omitted without a saving clause cannot survive for pending or subsequent proceedings, invalidating related SCNs and orders. |
| Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 |
Section 29 |
Nizora Projects (P.) Ltd. v. Union of India |
Click Here |
Cancellation of registration without service of SCN is invalid; assessee allowed 30 days to file pending returns, subject to tax, interest, and penalty liabilities. |
| Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 |
Section 50 |
Tej Farm Services v. Prakash Yadav, Joint Commisioner |
Click Here |
First appellate authority’s order sustaining quantified interest and penalty on non-fraud ITC reversal upheld due to lack of new rebutting evidence. |
| Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 |
Section 56 |
King Impex v. Commissioner of Delhi Goods and Services Tax |
Click Here |
Authorities have no discretion to deny statutory interest under Section 56 once a pre-deposit refund has been sanctioned. |
| Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 |
Section 73 |
St.Josephs Hospital Trust v. Joint Commissioner |
Click Here |
Issuing a single composite show cause notice covering multiple financial years is impermissible under GST law for non-fraud cases and is liable to be quashed. |
| Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 |
Section 73 |
Tej Farm Services v. Prakash Yadav, Joint Commisioner |
Click Here |
Reversal of excess CGST/SGST claimed beyond GSTR-2A sustained due to lack of supporting evidence, while IGST credit was properly allowed. |
| Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 |
Section 73 |
Star Raison Landmarks v. Chief Commissioner State Tax Commercial Taxes Department |
Click Here |
SCNs, assessment orders, and recovery notices lacking digital or physical signatures violate Rule 26(3) and are jurisdictional defects subject to quashing. |
| Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 |
Section 74 |
Eshwara Chandra Agencies v. Union of India |
Click Here |
Discrepancies between the order-in-original and summary DRC-07 rectified in writ proceedings require the petitioner to approach the appellate authority via statutory appeal. |
| Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 |
Section 107 |
Khandelwal Decor World v. Union of India |
Click Here |
Delay in filing appeal condoned as order uploaded solely on portal was known only after credit ledger recovery, constituting circumstances beyond petitioner’s control. |
| Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 |
Section 111 |
Adhunik Fire Appliances v. Himanshu |
Click Here |
Inherent powers of Tribunal exercised to grant urgent listing for business-paralyzed appellant without waiving statutory requirements or deciding on merits. |