Daily Archives: September 23, 2025

IMPORTANT INCOME TAX CASE LAW 21.09.2025

By | September 23, 2025

IMPORTANT INCOME TAX CASE LAW 21.09.2025 Section Case Law Title Brief Summary Citation Relevant Act Section 12A Vetaleshwar Shikshan Sanstha v. CIT, Exemption The Tribunal remanded the case back to the Commissioner (Exemption) because the trust’s application for registration was rejected for non-compliance, but the Commissioner failed to consider the trust’s timely response to the… Read More »

An appellate order passed without a hearing, violating court directions, is legally unsustainable.

By | September 23, 2025

An appellate order passed without a hearing, violating court directions, is legally unsustainable. Issue Is a final appellate order passed by the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC) legally valid if it is issued without providing an opportunity of hearing to the assessee, particularly when a High Court had already given specific directions regarding the disposal… Read More »

A TDS demand was deleted based on consistency with a co-purchaser’s favorable order.

By | September 23, 2025

A TDS demand was deleted based on consistency with a co-purchaser’s favorable order. Issue Can the tax department raise and sustain a TDS demand against one co-purchaser of a property when an identical demand against the other co-purchaser in the very same transaction has already been deleted by an appellate authority? Facts The assessee and… Read More »

Mechanical rejection of delay condonation is unsustainable; a reasoned order is mandatory.

By | September 23, 2025

Mechanical rejection of delay condonation is unsustainable; a reasoned order is mandatory. Issue Is a mechanical order from a tax authority rejecting a delay condonation application, without addressing the applicant’s specific reasons, legally valid? Facts An assessee filed their income tax return for the assessment year 2021-22 with a delay of 12 days. The assessee… Read More »

The receipt of a free flat during Assessment Year 2007-08 is not taxable, as Section 56(2)(v) of the Income-tax Act at that time only covered the receipt of money, not immovable property.

By | September 23, 2025

The receipt of a free flat during Assessment Year 2007-08 is not taxable, as Section 56(2)(v) of the Income-tax Act at that time only covered the receipt of money, not immovable property. Issue Whether the value of an immovable property, in this case a flat, received free of cost by an individual during the Assessment… Read More »

The receipt of a free flat during Assessment Year 2007-08 is not taxable, as Section 56(2)(v) of the Income-tax Act at that time only covered the receipt of money, not immovable property.

By | September 23, 2025

The receipt of a free flat during Assessment Year 2007-08 is not taxable, as Section 56(2)(v) of the Income-tax Act at that time only covered the receipt of money, not immovable property. Issue Whether the value of an immovable property, in this case a flat, received free of cost by an individual during the Assessment… Read More »

A provision for discount is an allowable expenditure if it is based on a scientific method and is consistently discharged in subsequent years.

By | September 23, 2025

A provision for discount is an allowable expenditure if it is based on a scientific method and is consistently discharged in subsequent years. Issue Is a “provision for discount” an allowable business expenditure under Section 37(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, or should it be disallowed as an inadmissible contingent liability? Facts For the assessment… Read More »

The rejection of a trust’s registration is invalid if the authority fails to consider a reply that the assessee has duly filed.

By | September 23, 2025

The rejection of a trust’s registration is invalid if the authority fails to consider a reply that the assessee has duly filed. Issue Is an order rejecting a trust’s application for registration under Section 12A of the Income-tax Act, 1961, sustainable in law if it is passed on the grounds of non-compliance, when in fact… Read More »

IMPORTANT GST CASE LAW 21.09.2025

By | September 23, 2025

IMPORTANT GST CASE LAW 21.09.2025 Section Case Law Title Brief Summary Citation Relevant Act Classification of Services Protego Services LLP, In re The AAR ruled that services for transportation and catering provided directly to school students are not exempt from GST, as the services were not rendered to the school administration but to the students… Read More »

Category: GST

Proceedings for excess stock found at a business premise must be initiated under Sections 73/74 of the CGST Act, not under the confiscation provisions of Section 130.

By | September 23, 2025

Proceedings for excess stock found at a business premise must be initiated under Sections 73/74 of the CGST Act, not under the confiscation provisions of Section 130. Issue Whether the discovery of excess stock during a survey at a taxpayer’s registered business premises should trigger confiscation proceedings under Section 130 of the CGST Act, or… Read More »

Category: GST