Daily Archives: April 4, 2026

Assam High Court Grants Bail: GST Arrest Before BNSS Notice Appearance Time is Procedurally Defective.

By | April 4, 2026

Assam High Court Grants Bail: GST Arrest Before BNSS Notice Appearance Time is Procedurally Defective. Invalidation of GST Arrest for BNSS Procedural Defect The Facts of the Case The Investigation: The Anti-Evasion Unit conducted a search and investigation into a firm for allegedly orchestrating a ₹35 crore fake Input Tax Credit (ITC) racket through non-existent… Read More »

Category: GST

Odisha High Court: Limitation Period Under Section 54 Cannot Bar Refund of Duplicate GST Payments.

By | April 4, 2026

Odisha High Court: Limitation Period Under Section 54 Cannot Bar Refund of Duplicate GST Payments. The Dispute: Double Payment and the “Limitation” Trap A duplicate payment made by mistake is not “tax” but a “deposit”; therefore, the statutory two-year limit for tax refunds does not apply. The Chronology of the Case 08.02.2021: The Petitioner first… Read More »

Category: GST

Gujarat High Court: ITC Not Blocked Under Section 17(5)(d) for Land Sub-Plotting Without Construction Activity.

By | April 4, 2026

Gujarat High Court: ITC Not Blocked Under Section 17(5)(d) for Land Sub-Plotting Without Construction Activity. The Dispute: Sub-Plotting vs. Construction (Section 17) ITC on goods and services used for sub-plotting land cannot be blocked under Section 17(5)(d) if no “construction” of an immovable property is undertaken. Facts of the Case The Business: The Petitioner (an… Read More »

Category: GST

Supreme Court: TCS Under Section 206C(1C) Not Applicable on Compounding Fees from Illegal Mining.

By | April 4, 2026

Supreme Court: TCS Under Section 206C(1C) Not Applicable on Compounding Fees from Illegal Mining. Facts of the Case The Audit: During a TDS survey at the office of a District Mining Officer (DMO), the Income Tax Department observed that the officer had collected compounding fees and fines from individuals caught in illegal mining or illegal… Read More »

Search Assessments Quashed: Defective Section 65B Certificates and Mechanical Section 153D Approvals Vitiate Tax Additions.

By | April 4, 2026

Search Assessments Quashed: Defective Section 65B Certificates and Mechanical Section 153D Approvals Vitiate Tax Additions. I. Admissibility of Digital Evidence (Section 153A & 65B) Crux: Digital snapshots (WhatsApp/SMS) are “Secondary Evidence” and are inadmissible without a valid Section 65B certificate and a clear Chain of Custody. The Evidence: The Assessing Officer (AO) based massive tax… Read More »

Supreme Court Rejects Revenue’s SLP; Cooperative Societies Eligible for Section 80P(2)(d) Deduction on Bank Interest.

By | April 4, 2026

Supreme Court Rejects Revenue’s SLP; Cooperative Societies Eligible for Section 80P(2)(d) Deduction on Bank Interest. Facts of the Case The Income: The assessee, a cooperative society, earned interest income on fixed deposits (FDs) kept with a Cooperative Bank. The Claim: The society claimed a 100% deduction on this interest under Section 80P(2)(d). The Revenue’s Objection:… Read More »

The Stamp Duty Value (SDV) as of the agreement date (2005) should be used, not the SDV on the registration date (2011).

By | April 4, 2026

The Stamp Duty Value (SDV) as of the agreement date (2005) should be used, not the SDV on the registration date (2011). The Conflict: The assessee signed an MOU in 2005 for ₹1.60 Cr. By the time the deed was registered in 2011 (due to government hurdles), the Stamp Authority valued it at ₹2.38 Cr.… Read More »

Supreme Court Rejects Bad Debt and Guarantee Claims; Affirms Interest Taxation on Accrual Basis.

By | April 4, 2026

Supreme Court Rejects Bad Debt and Guarantee Claims; Affirms Interest Taxation on Accrual Basis. I. Bad Debts vs. Capital Advances (Section 36(1)(vii)) Advances made for future share allotment or “helping” associates are capital in nature, not deductible bad debts. The Facts: The assessee advanced money to a business associate. Later, claiming the amount was irrecoverable,… Read More »

Gujarat High Court: Limitation for GST Appeal Commences from Date of Rectification Order Rejection.

By | April 4, 2026

Gujarat High Court: Limitation for GST Appeal Commences from Date of Rectification Order Rejection. The Chronology of the Case 12.08.2024: Original Adjudication Order (Order-in-Original) was passed. 05.11.2024: Within the three-month window for appeal, the Petitioner filed a Rectification Application under Section 161 to correct errors apparent on the face of the record. 19.03.2025: The Rectification… Read More »

Category: GST