Monthly Archives: April 2026

Orissa HC: GSTAT is Functional; Taxpayers Must File Appeals and Pay 20% Pre-deposit by June 2026.

By | April 25, 2026

Orissa HC: GSTAT is Functional; Taxpayers Must File Appeals and Pay 20% Pre-deposit by June 2026. The Dispute: The Mandatory Pre-Deposit Hurdles The Conflict: The petitioner lost their first appeal for the period 2019-20. To stay the tax demand, they filed a Writ Petition, arguing that the Second Appeal (to the GSTAT) was impossible because… Read More »

Category: GST

Madras HC: Excess Tax Deposits Must Be Adjusted Against Interest Before New Demands Are Issued.

By | April 25, 2026

Madras HC: Excess Tax Deposits Must Be Adjusted Against Interest Before New Demands Are Issued. The Dispute: Ignoring the Surplus Payment The Conflict: The petitioner had previously won a remand from the High Court in August 2024. As a condition for that remand, they were required to deposit 10% of the disputed tax. The Overpayment:… Read More »

Category: GST

Bombay HC: Taxpayers Cannot Challenge GST Law Validity Until Factual Adjudication is Complete.

By | April 25, 2026

Bombay HC: Taxpayers Cannot Challenge GST Law Validity Until Factual Adjudication is Complete. 1. The “Premature Writ” Doctrine The Conflict: Multiple businesses filed Writ Petitions to block the Revenue from acting on Show Cause Notices (SCN) or Pre-show cause intimations (DRC-01A). These notices alleged “Bogus ITC” based on invoices from unregistered suppliers or transactions without… Read More »

Category: GST

Karnataka HC: Ex-parte ITC Rejections Set Aside Subject to 10% Pre-deposit.

By | April 25, 2026

Karnataka HC: Ex-parte ITC Rejections Set Aside Subject to 10% Pre-deposit. The Dispute: The GSTR-2A/3B Reconciliation Trap The Conflict: For the financial year 2019-20, the petitioner was issued a Show Cause Notice (SCN) regarding discrepancies in their Input Tax Credit (ITC). The Ex-parte Order: The petitioner failed to reply to the notice, leading the Assessing… Read More »

Category: GST

Conservancy and Waste Carriage for Municipalities are “Pure Services” Exempt from GST.

By | April 25, 2026

Conservancy and Waste Carriage for Municipalities are “Pure Services” Exempt from GST. The Dispute: Waste Management as a Service vs. Trade The Scenario: A proprietorship firm was hired by a Municipal Corporation (HMC) for: Collecting segregated waste from secondary points. Transporting it to designated dumpsites using their own fuel-operated vehicles. Maintaining logs, weight slips, and… Read More »

Category: GST

Solar EPC: 70:30 Tax Split Cannot Be Applied Retrospectively Using a GST Circular.

By | April 25, 2026

Solar EPC: 70:30 Tax Split Cannot Be Applied Retrospectively Using a GST Circular. The Dispute: The 70:30 Split Controversy The Conflict: The petitioner, a Solar EPC provider, treated their contracts as a Composite Supply of a “Solar Power Generating System” taxable at 5% (the rate for solar equipment during 2018). The Revenue’s Stand: The Assessing… Read More »

Category: GST

Karnataka HC: No GST on Pigmy Agent Commissions as They are Bank Employees, Not Contractors.

By | April 25, 2026

Karnataka HC: No GST on Pigmy Agent Commissions as They are Bank Employees, Not Contractors. The Dispute: Business Facilitator vs. Bank Employee The Conflict: The Revenue conducted an inspection of the Rural Bank and issued Form GST DRC-01A, proposing to levy GST under the Reverse Charge Mechanism (RCM) on commissions paid to “Pigmy Agents” (doorstep… Read More »

Category: GST

AAR Ruling: RWA Corpus Funds Are Taxable at the Time of Receipt Without the ₹7,500 Exemption.

By | April 25, 2026

AAR Ruling: RWA Corpus Funds Are Taxable at the Time of Receipt Without the ₹7,500 Exemption. 1. The Nature of Supply: Corpus Fund is “Supply” The Dispute: The RWA argued that the Corpus Fund is a capital contribution from members for future contingencies (like painting or lift replacement) and should not be treated as a… Read More »

Category: GST

Important Income Tax Case Laws 25.04.2026

By | April 25, 2026

Important Income Tax Case Laws 25.04.2026 Relevant Act Section / Authority Case Law Title Citation Brief Summary Income-tax Act, 1961 Sec 2(24) / 115JB Graphite India Ltd. v. CIT Click Here Capital Subsidy: Sales tax remission linked to fixed capital investment is a capital receipt; not taxable and excluded from MAT (Sec 115JB). Income-tax Act,… Read More »