Monthly Archives: April 2026

SC Upholds: IBC Resolution Plan Overrides Tax Filing Delays; Losses Must Be Carried Forward.

By | April 4, 2026

SC Upholds: IBC Resolution Plan Overrides Tax Filing Delays; Losses Must Be Carried Forward. The Dispute The Situation: The assessee-company underwent the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP). During this time, the Resolution Professional failed to complete statutory audits or file Income Tax Returns (ITR) for AY 2018-19 and 2019-20. The New Management’s Action: Once the… Read More »

Tribunal Rules: Unrealized ‘Mark-to-Market’ Gains on Forward Contracts are Not Taxable Until Maturity.

By | April 4, 2026

Tribunal Rules: Unrealized ‘Mark-to-Market’ Gains on Forward Contracts are Not Taxable Until Maturity. Facts of the Case The Transaction: The assessee entered into forward contracts in commodity derivatives. The Accounting: Following standard accounting practices, the assessee valued these outstanding contracts at the end of the financial year based on the current market price. This resulted… Read More »

Madras High Court: Portal Notice Valid but Personal Hearing Mandatory Before Passing Ex Parte GST Order.

By | April 4, 2026

Madras High Court: Portal Notice Valid but Personal Hearing Mandatory Before Passing Ex Parte GST Order. Facts of the Case The Notice: The Department uploaded the Show Cause Notice (SCN) and subsequent reminders solely on the “View Additional Notices” tab of the GST Portal. The Default: The Petitioner did not see the notices, failed to… Read More »

Allahabad High Court: GST Appeal Limitation Runs from Date of DRC-07 Portal Upload, Not Physical Order Date.

By | April 4, 2026

Allahabad High Court: GST Appeal Limitation Runs from Date of DRC-07 Portal Upload, Not Physical Order Date. The Chronology of the Case The Interception: A consignment of networking machines was intercepted because Part-B of the e-way bill was not filled. The Penalty: A penalty order in Form GST MOV-09 was passed on 01.08.2022. The Delay:… Read More »

Category: GST

Madras High Court: GST Overdraft Account Attachment is Illegal; Belated Appeal Allowed Subject to 50% Pre-deposit.

By | April 4, 2026

Madras High Court: GST Overdraft Account Attachment is Illegal; Belated Appeal Allowed Subject to 50% Pre-deposit. The Problem: The Petitioner missed the statutory deadline (3 months + 1 month) to file an appeal under Section 107. Consequently, the Appellate Authority lost the power to condone the delay, and the Department began recovery. The Court’s Solution:… Read More »

Category: GST

Madras High Court Quashes GST Demand on Pre-GST Works; Directs Fresh Verification of Service Dates.

By | April 4, 2026

Madras High Court Quashes GST Demand on Pre-GST Works; Directs Fresh Verification of Service Dates. The Conflict The Notice: The Petitioner, a contractor for various State Government departments, was served a Show Cause Notice (SCN) under Section 73 for the periods 2017-18 to 2020-21. The Defense: The Petitioner argued that the demand included tax on… Read More »

Category: GST

Assam High Court Quashes GST Cancellation; Vague SCN and “Orders Under Dictation” Held Legally Void.

By | April 4, 2026

Assam High Court Quashes GST Cancellation; Vague SCN and “Orders Under Dictation” Held Legally Void. The Chronology of the Case The SCN: The Petitioner received a Show Cause Notice (SCN) proposing to cancel their GST registration. The sole allegation was that Input Tax Credit (ITC) was availed despite not being reflected in GSTR-2B. The Objection:… Read More »

Category: GST

Rule 86A allows an officer to freeze only the ITC actually available in the ledger; it does not grant the power to create a negative balance if the ledger is empty.

By | April 4, 2026

Rule 86A allows an officer to freeze only the ITC actually available in the ledger; it does not grant the power to create a negative balance if the ledger is empty. Facts of the Case The Action: The GST authorities invoked Rule 86A to block the Input Tax Credit (ITC) of the assessee, alleging that… Read More »

Category: GST

Supreme Court Rejects Revenue’s Appeal; Income Tax Refunds Cannot be Set Off Against Service Tax Dues.

By | April 4, 2026

Supreme Court Rejects Revenue’s Appeal; Income Tax Refunds Cannot be Set Off Against Service Tax Dues. The Conflict: The assessee was owed an Income Tax refund for AY 2018-19. Simultaneously, the Service Tax department (DGCEI) issued a Garnishee Notice under the Finance Act, 1994, ordering the Income Tax department to hand over that refund to… Read More »