Amount Received on Termination of Joint Venture Agreement Using Trademarks and Patents Is Not Taxable Under Unamended Section 55(2)

By | July 30, 2026

Amount Received on Termination of Joint Venture Agreement Using Trademarks and Patents Is Not Taxable Under Unamended Section 55(2)

Issue

Whether the amount received by the assessee on termination of a joint venture agreement involving the use of know-how, labels, trademarks, and patents was taxable as capital gains under Section 55(2) as it stood during Assessment Year 1998-99.

Facts

  • The matter pertains to Assessment Year 1998-99 involving the computation of capital gains under Section 55 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

  • The assessee had entered into a joint venture agreement under which it utilized know-how, labels, trademarks, and patents for manufacturing computers.

  • Upon termination of the joint venture agreement, the assessee received a monetary consideration.

  • The Revenue sought to tax this amount as capital gains, treating it under Section 55(2).

  • The High Court held that the consideration received on termination of the agreement was not taxable under Section 55(2) as the provision stood during the relevant assessment year.

  • The Revenue filed a Special Leave Petition (SLP) before the Supreme Court challenging the High Court’s decision.

Decision

  • The Supreme Court was not inclined to interfere with the impugned order passed by the High Court.

  • The Special Leave Petition (SLP) filed by the Revenue was dismissed.

  • The amount received on the termination of the joint venture agreement is confirmed as non-taxable under Section 55(2) for AY 1998-99. Decided in favor of the assessee.

Key Takeaways

  • Strict Construction of Statutory Definition: Capital gains cannot be levied on the transfer or surrender of rights/assets under Section 55(2) unless the specific asset is explicitly defined or covered under the statute during the relevant assessment year.

  • Cost of Acquisition Requirement: If the cost of acquisition of a capital asset or right cannot be determined or computed under the express provisions of Section 55(2) prior to statutory amendments, the computation mechanism fails, making the sum non-taxable.

  • Finality of Appellate Rulings: Dismissal of the Revenue’s SLP upholds the High Court’s view that receipts from the termination of intellectual property user rights under older provisions do not attract capital gains tax.

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Commissioner of Income-tax
v.
HCL Infosystems Ltd.
Surya Kant, CJ.
JOYMALYA BAGCHI and V. Mohana, JJ.
SLP Appeal (C) No(s). 31399 of 2016
JULY  13, 2026
Raj Bahadur YadavSudarshan Lamba, AORs, N. Venkataraman, ASG, Devashish Bharukha, Sr. Adv., Venkataraman Chandrashekhara BharathiRaghav Sharma and Mrs. Alka Aggarwal, Advs. for the Petitioner. Ajay Vohra, Sr. Adv., Vaibhav KulkarniYash Nagar, Advs. and Aniket Deepak Agrawal, AOR for the Respondent.
ORDER
1. Having heard the learned Additional Solicitor General of India on behalf of the petitioner and learned senior counsel for the respondent(s)-assessee (s) and keeping in view the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, we are not inclined to interfere with the impugned order dated 21.12.2015 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court. The Special Leave Petition is, accordingly, dismissed.
2. However, the question of law is kept open.
3. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand closed.