Supreme Court Issues Notice on High Court Order Refusing Condonation of Delay Beyond Section 107(4) Cap

By | July 30, 2026

Supreme Court Issues Notice on High Court Order Refusing Condonation of Delay Beyond Section 107(4) Cap

Supreme Court Issues Notice on High Court Order Refusing Condonation of Delay Beyond Section 107(4) Cap

Issue

Whether the limitation period for filing an appeal under Section 107 begins from the date of communication of the order-in-original, and whether appellate authorities possess the power to condone delays beyond the statutory outer cap specified under Section 107(4).

Facts

  • Impugned Order and Appeal: The Order-in-Original under Section 73 was passed on 21.11.2023 and duly communicated to the assessee on the same date.

  • Assessee’s Stand: The assessee contended that the order was not communicated before 14.06.2024, arguing that limitation should run from the date of actual receipt/knowledge rather than the date of issuance/transmission.

  • Rejection by First Appellate Authority: The Additional Commissioner (Appeals) rejected the condonation application and dismissed the appeal, holding that the delay exceeded the maximum period permissible under Section 107(4).

  • High Court Order: The High Court dismissed the writ petition, observing that:

    • The assessee’s own appeal memo admitted communication of the order on 21.11.2023, triggering the limitation clock from that date.

    • Section 107(4) impliedly excludes power to condone delay beyond the statutory outer limit, making the Appellate Authority’s rejection legally sound.

  • SLP Filed: The assessee filed a Special Leave Petition (SLP) before the Supreme Court challenging the High Court’s dismissal.

Decision

  • The Supreme Court issued notice to the respondents on the Special Leave Petition (SLP) filed by the assessee against the High Court order.

  • The matter remains pending for final adjudication before the Supreme Court. Decided partly in favor of the assessee (by virtue of issuing notice).

Key Takeaways

  • Supreme Court Scrutiny on Delay Condonation: By issuing notice, the Supreme Court has agreed to examine the extent of appellate powers regarding condonation of delay beyond the statutory threshold under Section 107(4).

  • Calculation of Limitation Period: The limitation period under GST appeals strictly commences from the date of legal communication of the order, not from a later date asserted by the assessee when record evidence proves earlier receipt.

  • Strict Construction of Statutory Caps: High Courts continue to take a rigid view that statutory provisions like Section 107(4) exclude inherent or discretionary powers to extend limitation windows beyond the express statutory cap.

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Sri Balaji Metallics (P.) Ltd.
v.
Commissioner of CT & GST
K.V. Viswanathan and SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR, JJ.
SLP to Appeal (C) No(s). 22223 of 2026
JULY  2, 2026
Kartik KurmyAjay Gupta, Advs. and Ashok Anand, AOR for the Petitioner.
ORDER
1. Issue notice to the respondents.
2. Liberty is granted to serve the Standing Counsel for the respondent(s).
3. Let a copy of this Petition additionally be given to Mr. Raghavendra P. Shankar, learned Additional Solicitor General.
4. List the matter for consideration on 27th July, 2026.