Assessment Reassessed Beyond Permissible Limitation Period Reconsidered Under Section 153C Reckoned Backwards Remains Time Barred
Issue
-
Whether the limitation period for initiating assessment or reassessment proceedings under Section 153C read with Section 153A must be calculated backwards from the assessment year in which the satisfaction note is recorded.
-
Whether the assessment order passed on March 30, 2023 for Assessment Year 2011-12, where the satisfaction note was recorded in Assessment Year 2022-23, is barred by limitation.
Facts
-
The case pertains to Assessment Year (AY) 2011-12 under the Income-tax Act, 1961.
-
The proceedings were initiated against the assessee pursuant to search and seizure action under Section 153C read with Section 153A.
-
The satisfaction note for initiating proceedings against the assessee under Section 153C was recorded in Assessment Year (AY) 2022-23.
-
The Assessing Officer passed the assessment order for AY 2011-12 on March 30, 2023.
Decision
-
Computation of Limitation: For the purpose of Section 153C read with Section 153A, the limitation period of block assessment years must be reckoned backwards from the date/assessment year in which the satisfaction note is recorded by the Assessing Officer.
-
Assessment Order Time-Barred: Since the satisfaction note was recorded in AY 2022-23, counting backwards places Assessment Year 2011-12 beyond the statutory limitation period permissible under Section 153C read with Section 153A.
-
Outcome: The assessment order passed on March 30, 2023 for AY 2011-12 was held to be barred by limitation and decided in favor of the assessee.
Key Takeaways
-
Satisfaction Note Date Controls Period: In Section 153C proceedings, the date on which the satisfaction note is recorded forms the baseline for computing the 6-year/10-year block period, not the date of search on the searched person.
-
Backward Reckoning Is Mandatory: Statutory block periods must be calculated backwards from the financial/assessment year in which the books/documents are received or satisfaction is recorded.
-
Strict Limitation Bar: Any assessment order passed for an assessment year falling outside the legally computable block period is void ab initio as barred by limitation.
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Consistent Builders (P.) Ltd.
v.
ACIT
Dinesh Mehta and Dr. Aditi Choudhary, JJ.
W.P.(C) No. 6181 of 2023
CM APPL. No. 24306 of 2023
CM APPL. No. 24306 of 2023
SEPTEMBER 29, 2026
P. Roychaudhuri and Gagan Gupta, Advs. for the Petitioner. Ruchir Bhatia, SSC, Anant Mann and Pratyaksh Gupta, JSCs for the Respondent.
JUDGMENT
Dinesh Mehta, J. – By way of present writ petition preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has challenged order dated 30.03.2023 passed under Section 153C of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘Act of 1961’) in furtherance of the satisfaction note dated 25.06.2021 recorded by the Assessing Officer for assessment year 2011-12.
2. Learned Counsel for the petitioner at the outset argued that the impugned order has been passed beyond the time period prescribed under Section 153A read with Section 153C of the Act of 1961 as prevailing at the relevant time (AY 2011-12).
3. He submitted that the issue involved in the present writ petition is squarely covered by judgment of this Court rendered in the case of Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-1 (Central-1) v. Ojjus Medicare Pvt. Ltd. 465 ITR 101 (Delhi).
4. Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, learned Senior Standing Counsel for the Department could not dispute the aforesaid position of facts involved. He, however, submitted that an SLP against the said judgment has been filed before Hon’ble the Supreme Court.
5. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
6. It does not need much discussion that as the satisfaction note was recorded on 25.06.2021, i.e. in the assessment year 2022-23, the order passed on 30.03.2023 qua assessment year 2011-12 is clearly beyond the limitation period (which shall be 10 years as the escaped income is more than Rs.50,00,000/-), if calculated backward from assessment year 2022-23.
For ease of understanding, a tabular depiction is made hereunder:
| Year No. (counted backwards) | Assessment Year |
| 1 | AY 2022-23 |
| 2 | AY 2021-22 |
| 3 | AY 2020-21 |
| 4 | AY 2019-20 |
| 5 | AY 2018-19 |
| 6 | AY 2017-18 |
| 7 | AY 2016-17 |
| 8 | AY 2015-16 |
| 9 | AY 2014-15 |
| 10th year | AY 2013-14 |
7. The impugned order is, thus, time-barred on a plain reading of Sections 153A and 153C of the Act of 1961 so also in light of Ojjus Medicare Pvt. Ltd. (supra).
8. The writ petition is allowed, the order dated 30.03.2023 is quashed. Pending application stands disposed of.

