Revenue must pay 6% compensatory interest on delayed, unpaid Section 244A statutory refund interest.

By | September 11, 2026
Revenue must pay 6% compensatory interest on delayed, unpaid Section 244A statutory refund interest.
Issue
  1. Whether the Revenue must be directed to rectify the computation and release the balance interest when statutory interest under Section 244A was incorrectly computed.
  2. Whether the Revenue is liable to pay interest or compensation to the assessee on delayed, unpaid Section 244A interest for the period of delay.
Facts
  • The assessee filed a rectification application for Assessment Year 2019-20, claiming short grant of statutory interest due under Section 244A.
  • The tax authority accepted the assessee’s grievance regarding the incorrect computation and short grant of interest.
  • The authority subsequently informed the assessee that the balance interest due could not be processed and paid due to system issues.
  • The remaining interest amount due to the assessee under Section 244A remained unpaid for over 4 years.
  • The assessee filed a writ petition seeking directions for the release of the balance interest along with further interest/compensation on the unpaid interest from 19-04-2022 until the actual date of payment.
Decision
  • The Revenue is directed to rectify the incorrect computation under Section 244A and release the remaining balance interest to the assessee.
  • Even in the absence of an explicit statutory provision for interest on interest, the assessee is entitled to compensation for the delay in releasing funds that constitute a debt owed by the Revenue.
  • Either as interest or as compensation, the assessee is entitled to interest on the unpaid Section 244A interest for the entire period of delay.
  • The compensatory interest must be calculated in accordance with Section 244A at the rate of 6% per annum from 19-04-2022 until the date of actual payment (ruled in favor of the assessee).
Key Takeaways
  • Mandated Rectification: Incorrectly computed statutory interest under Section 244A must be rectified and fully released without delay by the Revenue.
  • Compensation for Unpaid Interest: Unpaid statutory refund interest represents a debt owed by the State; any arbitrary delay in payment warrants compensation even if “interest on interest” is not explicitly coded into the statute.
  • Applicable Interest Rate: Compensatory interest on delayed refund interest is payable at the statutory rate of 6% per annum under Section 244A / Section 437 from the date of default until actual payment.
HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
CIE Automotive India Ltd.
v.
Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax
B.P. COLABAWALLA and FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, JJ.
WRIT PETITION NO. 2468 OF 2025
JULY  14, 2026
Nishant ThakkarMs. Jasmin Amalsadvala and Hiten Thakkar for the Petitioner. P. A. Narayanan for the Respondent.
ORDER
1. Rule. Respondents waive service. With the consent of parties, Rule is made returnable forthwith and heard finally.
2. The above Writ Petition is filed seeking a direction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to order the Respondents to pay Rs.3,25,83,819/- [being outstanding interest payable] under Section 244A of the Income Tax Act, 1961(“the Act”) on the tax refunded to the Petitioner for the Assessment Year 2019-20 and also pay further interest for the delay in paying the said sum of Rs.3,25,83,819/-.
3. The Petitioner submitted that it had filed a Return of Income for Assessment Year 2019-20 claiming a refund of Rs. 28,78,09,240/-. The said return was processed under Section 143(1) of the Act on 23rd June 2026 wrongly computing a refund of Rs. 8,58,63,229/- and interest under Section 244A thereon of Rs.64,39,740/-. The Petitioner filed a Rectification Application dated 8th October 2020 (Exhibit D) submitting that the error in computing the refund and the interest thereon occurred since the Respondents had not considered the taxes paid by Bharat Forge Pvt Ltd., which amalgamated with the Petitioner with effect from 1st April 2018 pursuant to the Orders of the National Company Law Tribunal dated 4th November 2019. The said Rectification Application dated 8th October 2020 (Exhibit D) was allowed by the Respondents vide Order dated 1st July 2021 (Exhibit H). However, in the computation sheet attached to the Order dated 1st July 2021, though the amount of income-tax refund due to the Petitioner was corrected to Rs. 28,78,09,240/- (as claimed in the Return of Income), the interest under Section 244A was incorrectly computed at Rs.84,59,200/-. On 3rd September 2021, the refund computed as per Order dated 1st July 2021 (Exhibit H) was partially adjusted and the balance was paid to the Respondent. Since the interest under Section 244A was wrongly computed, the Petitioner filed a second Rectification Application dated 30th November 2021 (Exhibit L) explaining the error, and after factoring the refund granted, the Petitioner computed the sum of Rs.3,25,83,819/- as the interest under Section 244A remaining payable. The Respondents, vide Order dated 19th April 2022 (Exhibit M), found the grievance of the Petitioner to be correct but in the computation sheet attached to the Order erroneously reflected interest payable under Section 244A at Rs.94,68,930/-. The Petitioner submitted that despite raising grievances and several follow-ups the Respondents have till date not refunded the interest under Section 244A due to the Petitioner. It is in the aforementioned circumstances that the Petitioner prays that the Respondents be ordered and directed to pay the outstanding interest under Section 244A of Rs.3,25,83,819/- along with further interest thereon from 19th April 2022 (i.e. the date of the Order in which the amount as calculated by the Petitioner was accepted to be correct). In this regard, Counsel for the Petitioner placed reliance on the decision of this Court in the case of Capgemini Technology Services India Ltd v. DIT  (Bombay).
4. Mr. P.A. Narayanan, the learned counsel for the Respondents, tendered a copy of the email dated 8th January 2026 received by him from Respondent No.1 in response to the enquiry made by him with Respondent No.1 pursuant to the hearing on 5th January 2026. The same is taken on record and marked “X” for identification. For the sake of convenience, the said email is reproduced hereunder:-
“From :mumbai.dcit7.1.1 <mumbai.dcit7.1.1@incometax.gov.in>
Date: Thu, 8 Jan, 2026, 2:15pm
Subject: Re: WRIT PETITION L NO. 14346 OF 2025 – CIE AUTOMOTIVE INDIA LIMITED v. ACIT – CIRCLE 7(1)(1), MUMBAI & OTHERS
To: PA NARAYANAN <narayananpa@gmail.com>
Sir,
Refer to under trailing mail.
In this case, following details can be seen from the records available in ITBA system as on date: –
The assessee filed its return of income on 30.11.2019 claiming refund of Rs. 28,78,09,240/-. Thereafter, the same was processed u/s 143(1) dated 23.06.2020 determining a refund of Rs. 9,23,02,970/.
The assessee further filed rectification u/s 154 of the act stating that less refund was issued. Accordingly, rectification u/s 154 dated 01.07.2021 was carried out and refund of Rs. 20,39,65,469 /- including interest of Rs. 84,59,200/- u/s 244A of the act was issued by CPC.
Further, rectification order u/s 154 dated 19/04/2022 was passed. The contents of the same is as follows: –
“In this case, order u/s 154 dated 01.07.2021 has been passed assessing total income at Rs. 131,69,52,840/- and determining refund of Rs. 20,39,65,469/- payable to the assessee. The assessee vide its rectification application dated 30.11.2021 has stated that while passing the above order, interest u/s 244A has been short granted. On verification of records, the contention of the assessee is found to be correct. The above, the mistake apparent from records is hereby rectified u/s 154 of the I.T. Act, 1961. The total income remains unchanged as above.”
During the time of calculation, interest u/s 244A was given by the AO, however the same was aborted by the system. In this regard, the copy of rectification order dated 19/04/2022 alongwith its computation sheet is attached for your reference.
Regards,
Dy Commissioner of Income Tax
Circle 7(1)(1), Mumbai
_ _ _ _ _____________________________
On 01/07/26 12:52 PM,P A
ARAYANAN<narayananpa@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear Sir,
The above matter was listed for hearing on 5/1/2026.
The Hon’ble Court has sought an explanation from the Revenue for granting the statutory interest u/s 244A of the Act,
The matter is now listed on 12/1/2026 for tendering such an explanation. As such you are requested to provide the explanation by return email to enable the undersigned to apprise the Hon’ble Court about the same.
Your prompt response in the matter is requested.
Thanks & regards,
P. A. Narayanan
Advocate
C-1403, Odyessey, Bhakti Park, Wadala (East), Mumbai 400 037. Mobile: 9820279948″
(emphasis supplied)
5. On the issue of compensation or interest on delayed payment of interest, Mr. P.A. Narayanan submitted that there is no such provision for payment of interest on delayed payment of interest, and therefore such relief cannot be granted.
6. We have heard the learned Counsel for the parties and perused the papers and proceedings.
7. In so far as the claim of the Petitioner, that interest under Section 244A is incorrectly computed is concerned, the same is not disputed by the Respondents. Indeed, Respondent No.1, in his email to Mr. P.A. Narayanan, has reiterated the findings in the Order dated 19th April 2022 that the grievance of the Petitioner as set out in the Rectification Application dated 30th November 2021 (Exhibit M) is “found to be correct” and in fact attributes the erroneous computation of interest under Section 244A to the “system”. In these circumstances, the computation of interest as per the second Rectification Application dated 30th November 2021 (Exhibit M) deserves to be accepted and consequently the prayer of the Petitioner to direct and order the Respondents to pay Rs.3,25,83,819/- has to be granted.
8. Insofar as the prayer for further interest on Rs.3,25,83,819/- from 19th April 2022 (i.e. the date of the Order in which the amount as calculated by the Petitioner was accepted to be correct) is concerned, we find that the interest of Rs.3,25,83,819/- was not paid for now over 4 years despite having accepted the Rectification Application of the Petitioner vide Order dated 19th April 2022 and the only reason given is the inability of the system to process the interest. It is undisputed that interest due to the Petitioner has remained unpaid. The delay in making such payment is admittedly not attributable to the Petitioner. In Capgemini Technology Services India Ltd (supra) we have held as under:

“11. Insofar as the relief in paragraph 2(d) is concerned, the interest under Section 244A(1A) of Rs. 7,58,77,348/- for three years combined, though determined on 23.08.2023, has not been paid till date and more than 2 years have elapsed. We are of the view that the Petitioner is entitled to interest even on such delayed payment of interest. Very recently, a Division Bench of this Court in case of Tata Communications Ltd. (supra), following the decision in case of India Trade Promotion Organisation (supra) of the Delhi High Court, has directed the Department to grant interest on delayed payment of interest already determined. The relevant paragraph is quoted as under:

“Therefore, though one may call it as interest on interest, in reality payment of interest on the unpaid amount occurs because of nonpayment of the total amount refundable, which is due and payable to the assessee consisting of the tax, which had to be refunded and the interest accrued on the delayed refund of the tax. The principal amount and the interest due to be added and treated as primary amount and interest becomes due and payable on this primary amount. It will be incorrect to treat it as compounding of interest. If this interpretation or approach is taken it would ensure that the Assessing Officer/Revenue refund the entire amount, which is due and payable, including interest payable under Section 244A. It discourages part payment.”

12. A Special Leave Petition against the said order has been dismissed in DCIT v. Tata Communications Ltd. [2025]   (SC), both on merits and delay.

13. In any event, even if one argues that there is no provision for payment of interest on interest, still the Hon’ble Supreme Court, and this Court, both have held that dehors any specific provision for payment of interest, interest has to be paid as a matter of compensation for use of funds which is debt-owed and payable by the Revenue. In this regard, paragraphs 37 and 38 of the decision in case of Tata Chemicals Ltd (supra) is reproduced hereunder:

“37. A “tax refund” is a refund of taxes when the tax liability is less than the tax paid. As per the old section an assessee was entitled for payment of interest on the amount of taxes refunded pursuant to an order. passed under the Act, including the order passed in an appeal. In the present fact scenario, the deductor/assessee had paid taxes pursuant to a special order passed by the assessing officer/Income Tax Officer. In the appeal filed against the said order the assessee has succeeded and a direction is issued by the appellate authority to refund the tax paid. The amount paid by the resident/deductor was retained by the Government till a direction was issued by the appellate authority to refund the same. When the said amount is refunded it should carry interest in the matter of course. As held by the Courts while awarding interest, it is a kind of compensation of use and retention of the money collected unauthorizedly by the Department. When the collection is illegal, there is corresponding obligation on the revenue to refund such amount with interest in as much as they have retained and enjoyed the money deposited. Even the Department has understood the object behind insertion of Section 244A, as that, an assessee is entitled to payment of interest for money remaining with the Government which would be refunded. There is no reason to restrict the same to an assessee only without extending the similar benefit to a resident/deductor who has deducted tax at source and deposited the same before remitting the amount payable to a non-resident/foreign company.

(emphasis supplied)

38. Providing for payment of interest in case of refund of amounts paid as tax or deemed tax or advance tax is a method now statutorily adopted by fiscal legislation to ensure that the aforesaid amount of tax which has been duly paid in prescribed time and provisions in that behalf form part of the recovery machinery provided in a taxing Statute. Refund due and payable to the assessee is debt-owed and payable by the Revenue. The Government, there being no express statutory provision for payment of interest on the refund of excess amount/tax collected by the Revenue, cannot shrug off its apparent obligation to reimburse the deductors lawful monies with the accrued interest for the period of undue retention of such monies. The State having received the money without right, and having retained and used it, is bound to make the party good, just as an individual would be under like circumstances. The obligation to refund money received and retained without right implies and carries with it the right to interest. Whenever money has been received by a party which ex ae quo et bono ought to be refunded, the right to interest follows, as a matter of course.”

14.This decision was thereafter followed by this Court in Group M Media India (P) Ltd. (supra). In this case, despite there being no provision for grant of interest on refund of Equalisation Levy, the Court granted interest @ 6% by relying upon the principles as laid down in the case of Tata Chemicals (supra).”

9. Therefore, either by way of interest or by way of compensation, the Petitioner should be entitled to interest on Rs.3,25,83,819/-, which interest was not paid for over 4 years. Such interest should be calculated in accordance with the provisions of Section 244A of the Act from 19th April 2022 till the date of payment at the rate of 6% per annum.
10. In light of the above, we direct the Respondents:
a. to carry out necessary rectification to reflect interest payable under Section 244A for Assessment Year 2019-20 as per Rectification Application dated 30th November 2021 (Exhibit L);
b. to pay Rs.3,25,83,819/- as outstanding interest under Section 244A for Assessment Year 2019-20; and
c. to pay interest or compensation at the rate of 6% per annum on delayed payment of interest of Rs.3,25,83,819/- from 19th April 2022 till the date of payment.
11. All the above directions should be complied with on or before 17th August 2026.
12. Rule is made absolute in the aforesaid terms, and the Petition is also disposed of in terms thereof, with no orders as to costs.
13. Though we have disposed of the above Petition, we keep it on board for reporting compliance on 18th August 2026.
14. This Order will be digitally signed by the Private Secretary/Personal Assistant of this Court. All concerned will act on production by fax or email of a digitally signed copy of this Order.