Unclaimed balance 50% additional depreciation on machinery used for under 180 days is allowable in subsequent year.

By | October 28, 2026
Unclaimed balance 50% additional depreciation on machinery used for under 180 days is allowable in subsequent year.

Issue

  • Whether an assessee is entitled to claim the remaining 50% balance of additional depreciation under Section 32(1)(iia) of the Income-tax Act in a subsequent assessment year on eligible plant and machinery that was acquired and put to use for less than 180 days in the immediately preceding assessment year.

Facts

  • The assessee acquired and commissioned new eligible plant and machinery in the immediately preceding financial year.
  • The machinery was put to use for less than 180 days during that initial financial year.
  • Due to the restriction under the second proviso to Section 32(1), the assessee claimed only 50% of the permissible additional depreciation in that initial assessment year.
  • For the assessment year under consideration (A.Y. 2006-07), the assessee claimed the remaining balance of 50% of the additional depreciation under Section 32(1)(iia).
  • The Revenue contested the claim for the balance additional depreciation in the subsequent assessment year.

Decision

  • Balance Claim Permissible: The assessee is entitled to claim the balance 50% of the additional depreciation under Section 32(1)(iia) in the subsequent assessment year.
  • Proviso Restriction Scope: The restriction in the second proviso to Section 32(1) merely caps the depreciation allowable in the initial year of acquisition/use (to 50% when used for less than 180 days) but does not extinguish the entitlement to the remaining half in the succeeding year.
  • Ruling in Favor of Assessee: The issue was decided entirely in favor of the assessee.

Key Takeaways

  • No Forfeiture of Benefit: Additional depreciation under Section 32(1)(iia) is an incentive scheme; put-to-use restrictions of less than 180 days in the initial year only defer the remaining 50% benefit to the next year rather than forfeiting it completely.
  • Legislative Intent: The statutory restriction on half-year depreciation limits the quantum for that specific year of acquisition without wiping out the overall statutory entitlement of the tax incentive.
HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Wheels India Ltd.
v.
Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax
Dr. Anita Sumanth and K. Rajasekar, JJ.
TCA No. 986 of 2015†
OCTOBER  6, 2026
R. Venkatanarayanan and Subbaraya Aiyar for the Appellant. Ms.V.Pushpa, Senior Standing Counsel for the Respondent.
JUDGMENT
Dr. Anita Sumanth J. -This is an appeal at the instance of the assessee challenging order dated 14.03.2014 of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (Tribunal) for the assessment year 2006 – 07. The substantial questions of law admitted on 27.10.2015 are as follows:-
1 . Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in holding that assessee is not entitled for balance 50% of additional depreciation in the current assessment year in respect of assets acquired in previous year and put to use for less than 180 days?
2 .Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law the entitlement to additional depreciation u/s.32(iia) which is vested as incentive for investments in new plant and machinery can be divested by the second proviso to Sec.32(1) which restricted it to 50 per cent?
3 .Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law the Tribunal ought to have appreciated that second proviso to Sec.32(1) only restricts the quantum of depreciation allowable in the first year of use but in no way restricts or reduces the total amount of Additional depreciation allowable in respect of eligible plant and machinery?
2. The issue relates to whether the balance of additional depreciation of 50% of which 50% had been claimed in the first year, may be carried forward to the subsequent year. This issue has been answered in the assessee’s own case in Wheels India Ltd. v. Asstt. CIT (LTU Appeals)  (Madras) accepting the claim. Hence, the questions of law are answered in favour of the assessee.
3. This Tax Case (Appeal) is allowed. No costs.