GST CASE LAWS 14.08.2026

By | August 15, 2026

GST CASE LAWS 14.08.2026

Section / Rule Case Law Title Brief Summary Citation Relevant Act
Section 9 Naganath Constructions Engineers and Contractors v. Government of Karnataka Civil contractor executing works under a State contract is entitled to reimbursement of differential GST arising from the transition from VAT to the GST regime, as the tax burden rests on the service recipient. Click Here Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017
Rule 12 Vibrant Products v. Union of India Abatement of cess operates with reference to total monthly production capacity rather than the specific installation date of additional packing machines; constitutional challenge to Rule 12(4) dismissed with liberty to pursue statutory appeal. Click Here Health Security Se National Security Cess Rules, 2026
Section 29 PS Enterprises v. Commissioner, Central Goods and Services Tax Retrospective cancellation of GST registration without explicitly proposing retrospective effect in the Show Cause Notice exceeds jurisdiction and is unsustainable; cancellation order and SCN quashed. Click Here Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017
Section 56 Synchrony International Service (P.) Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner (ST), STU-1 Where principal refund has already been sanctioned, authorities cannot mandate fresh certification/compliance under Rule 89(2)(m) to grant statutory interest on delayed refunds; interest must be computed directly from original refund orders. Click Here Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017
Section 128A Indian Bank v. Assistant Commissioner CGST and Central Excise Proper Officer who passed a combined multi-state Section 73 order cannot split jurisdiction or reject waiver relief under Form GST SPL-02 for another state (Maharashtra) under Section 128A(1)(b). Click Here Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017
Section 171 DG Anti Profiteering v. Amal Realtors (P.) Ltd. Anti-profiteering allegations dismissed where agreement was entered post-GST, VAT was paid only on nominal advance, and ITC-to-purchase ratio declined post-GST, confirming no extra input credit benefit accrued. Click Here Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017
Section 171 DG Anti Profiteering v. Amal Realtors (P.) Ltd. Anti-profiteering proceedings closed based on CA-certified project data showing an overall reduction in the post-GST ITC ratio across eligible project units, establishing no obligation for price reduction. Click Here Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017