Assignment of Leasehold Rights in Land and Building Is Immovable Property Transfer, Exempt From GST

By | July 27, 2026

Assignment of Leasehold Rights in Land and Building Is Immovable Property Transfer, Exempt From GST

Issue

Whether GST is leviable under Section 7 of the CGST/GGST Act on the assignment and transfer of leasehold rights in a plot of land and building constructed thereon for a lump-sum consideration.

Facts

  • Original Lease: A plot of land was allotted on lease by the State Industrial Development Corporation (GIDC), and a building was subsequently constructed thereon by the lessee/assignor.

  • Transaction: The lessee/assignor assigned and transferred its leasehold rights in the plot along with the building to a third-party assignee in exchange for a lump-sum payment.

  • Substitution of Lease: Following the assignment, the third-party assignee stepped into the shoes of the original allottee and became the direct lessee of GIDC.

  • High Court Ruling: The High Court held that the transaction constituted a transfer of benefits arising out of “immovable property” under the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, and therefore fell outside the scope of “supply” under GST laws.

  • Revenue’s Appeal: The Revenue filed a Special Leave Petition (SLP) before the Supreme Court challenging the High Court’s decision.

Decision

  • The Supreme Court noted that a similar SLP on identical legal issues had already been dismissed in Assistant Commissioner (Anti Evasion) v. Aerocom Cushions (P.) Ltd.   (SC).

  • Following the established precedent, the Supreme Court dismissed the Revenue’s Special Leave Petition.

  • The High Court’s order holding that GST is not leviable on the assignment of leasehold rights was upheld.

  • The issue was decided in favour of the assessee.

Key Takeaways

  • Immovable Property Exclusion: The assignment of long-term leasehold rights in land and buildings for lump-sum consideration represents a transfer of benefits arising out of immovable property, which is excluded from the scope of GST “supply.”

  • Supreme Court Precedent: The dismissal of the Revenue’s SLP, relying on Aerocom Cushions (P.) Ltd., affirms that assignment of leasehold plots allotted by industrial development corporations does not attract GST liability under Section 7 read with Section 9 of the CGST Act.

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Union of India
v.
Gujarat Chamber of Commerce and Industry
PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA and ALOK ARADHE, JJ.
SLP (CIVIL) Diary No (s). 33270 of 2025
JULY  21, 2026
Ms. Deepanwita PriyankaGurmeet Singh Makker, AORs, V.C. BharathiNavanjay MahapatraGaurang BhushanSaurabh Singh Fauzdar, Advs. and N. Venkataraman, A.S.G. for the Petitioner. Shyam DivanPrakash Shah, Sr. Advs., Pradhuman GohilMs. Hetvi PatelRushabh N. KapadiaMs. Taniya BansalPulkit KhandujaTarak DamaniDr. Avinash PoddarMs. Samiksha GoswamiAwadhesh SharmaJay SavlaMihir MehtaJas SanghaviMohit RavalJasdeep Singh DhillonPrabhat ChaurasiaAnirudh JamwalAditya BajajMs. Kenisha SavlaRajat BoseAayush AgarwalaAnuj P. AgarwalaGaurav VermaAmay BahriManav GuptaAnkit GuptaShikhar AggarwalJoshua Tom ThomasMs. Rudrani MishraMs. Shohni BhattacharyaVekant Prasad, Advs., Mrs. Taruna Singh GohilMs. Ishita FarsaiyaVishnu KantS. S. ShroffRony Oommen John and Yash S. Vijay, AORs for the Respondent.
ORDER
1. Delay condoned.
2. This Court, vide order dated 22.05.2026, has already dismissed a Special Leave Petition, being Asstt. Commissioner (Anti Evasion) v. Aerocom Cushions (P.) Ltd 116 GST 80/109 GSTL 289 (SC)/SLP (C) No. 18772/2026.
3. In view of the fact that a similar SLP has been dismissed, the instant special leave petitions are dismissed.
4. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.