Tag Archives: HIGH COURT OF KERALA

Composite GST Show Cause Notices Covering Multiple Financial Years Are Legally Unsustainable And Must Be Quashed

By | July 7, 2026

Composite GST Show Cause Notices Covering Multiple Financial Years Are Legally Unsustainable And Must Be Quashed Issue Whether a consolidated or composite Show Cause Notice (SCN) issued under Section 73 of the CGST/SGST Act covering multiple financial years (2019-20 to 2021-22) is legally sustainable, or if the tax authorities are mandated to issue separate notices… Read More »

Depreciation on lapsed 50% GST under Section 17(4) does not restrict the remaining 50% ITC.

By | July 7, 2026

Depreciation on lapsed 50% GST under Section 17(4) does not restrict the remaining 50% ITC. Issue Whether a banking company that opts to avail 50% Input Tax Credit (ITC) under Section 17(4)—allowing the remaining 50% to lapse and be capitalized for Income Tax depreciation—can be denied the availed 50% ITC under Section 16(3) on the… Read More »

ITC is valid via self-invoice under RCM and pre-amendment cross-charge without ISD registration is legal.

By | July 7, 2026

ITC is valid via self-invoice under RCM and pre-amendment cross-charge without ISD registration is legal. ITC is valid via self-invoice under RCM and pre-amendment cross-charge without ISD registration is legal. Issue Whether Input Tax Credit (ITC) can be denied to a distinct state unit that discharged tax under Reverse Charge Mechanism (RCM) and issued a… Read More »

ITC Cannot Be Denied Under General Time Limits If Filed Within Special Non-Obstante Cut-off

By | July 3, 2026

ITC Cannot Be Denied Under General Time Limits If Filed Within Special Non-Obstante Cut-off Issue Whether Input Tax Credit (ITC) can be legally denied under the general time limits of Section 16(4) of the CGST/SGST Act if the taxpayer filed their returns within the specific timeline provided by a special non-obstante credit provision. Facts The… Read More »

Remanded for Tribunal to Specifically Adjudicate Mechanical Approval Challenge Under Section 153D of Income-tax Act

By | July 2, 2026

Remanded for Tribunal to Specifically Adjudicate Mechanical Approval Challenge Under Section 153D of Income-tax Act Issue Whether the Tribunal’s order is sustainable when it failed to specifically adjudicate the assessee’s contention that the approval granted by the JCIT under Section 153D was vitiated due to a mechanical application of mind, despite the issue being properly… Read More »

Reassessment Proceedings Initiated Beyond the Five Year Statutory Limitation Period Are Wholly Void and Untenable

By | June 27, 2026

Reassessment Proceedings Initiated Beyond the Five Year Statutory Limitation Period Are Wholly Void and Untenable Reassessment Proceedings Initiated Beyond the Five Year Statutory Limitation Period Are Wholly Void and Untenable Issue Whether a reassessment notice issued under Section 25A read with Section 25(1) of the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003, for the period 2009-10… Read More »

Deductions Under Section 80HHC Are Not Reduced by Section 80IA, and Capital-Linked Sales-Tax Remissions Are Capital Receipts

By | June 18, 2026

Deductions Under Section 80HHC Are Not Reduced by Section 80IA, and Capital-Linked Sales-Tax Remissions Are Capital Receipts Issue Whether business profits must be reduced by deductions allowed under Section 80IA while computing the deduction under Section 80HHC of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Whether a sales-tax remission granted under the West Bengal Incentive Scheme, 1993—explicitly linked… Read More »

Inadvertent Cross-Utilization of Legitimate IGST Credit Under CGST and SGST Heads is a Technical Error That Cannot Be Penalized Under Section 73

By | June 15, 2026

Inadvertent Cross-Utilization of Legitimate IGST Credit Under CGST and SGST Heads is a Technical Error That Cannot Be Penalized Under Section 73 Issue Whether the tax authorities are legally justified in treating the inadvertent cross-utilization or misreporting of eligible Integrated Goods and Services Tax (IGST) input tax credit under Central GST (CGST) and State GST… Read More »

Denial Of Input Tax Credit Recovery Based On An Inadvertent Cross-Utilisation Mistake Is Legally Unsustainable Because Intradepartmental Balances Do Not Constitute Tax Evasion

By | June 13, 2026

Denial Of Input Tax Credit Recovery Based On An Inadvertent Cross-Utilisation Mistake Is Legally Unsustainable Because Intradepartmental Balances Do Not Constitute Tax Evasion Issue Whether the tax authorities are justified in passing a recovery order under Section 73 of the Kerala GST Act for the period April 2018 to March 2019, on the ground that… Read More »

Composite Show Cause Notice and Adjudication Order Covering Multiple Assessment Years Is Legally Impermissible

By | June 12, 2026

Composite Show Cause Notice and Adjudication Order Covering Multiple Assessment Years Is Legally Impermissible Issue Whether the Revenue can issue a single, composite Show Cause Notice (SCN) and subsequent adjudication order under Section 73 spanning multiple financial years, or if tax periods must be initiated and adjudicated separately for each individual assessment year. Facts The… Read More »