Tag Archives: HIGH COURT OF MADRAS

Ex-Parte Assessment Order Involving GSTR Mismatches Set Aside And Remanded Due To Timing Differences In Government TDS Reporting

By | July 11, 2026

Ex-Parte Assessment Order Involving GSTR Mismatches Set Aside And Remanded Due To Timing Differences In Government TDS Reporting Issue Whether an ex-parte assessment order imposing tax, interest, and Section 74 penalties due to variations between GSTR-1/GSTR-3B and Form GSTR-7 can be sustained when the discrepancy arises because government departments report transactions and deposit TDS only… Read More »

Invocation of Section 74 Is Valid on Prima Facie Material but Material Errors Require Remand

By | July 11, 2026

Invocation of Section 74 Is Valid on Prima Facie Material but Material Errors Require Remand Invocation of Section 74 Is Valid on Prima Facie Material but Material Errors Require Remand Issue Whether the revenue authorities are legally entitled to invoke the fraud machinery under Section 74 based on the prima facie standard of “where it… Read More »

Rule 257 One-Year Practice Requirement for Income Tax Practitioner Registration is Statutorily Valid and Enforceable

By | July 11, 2026

Rule 257 One-Year Practice Requirement for Income Tax Practitioner Registration is Statutorily Valid and Enforceable Issue Whether Rule 257 of the Income-tax Rules, 2026, which mandates a minimum of one year of prior appearance/practice before Income Tax Authorities to qualify for registration as an Income Tax Practitioner, is ultra vires or inconsistent with Section 515… Read More »

Textile machinery replacement expenditure is remanded for fresh verification under Supreme Court repair guidelines.

By | July 10, 2026

Textile machinery replacement expenditure is remanded for fresh verification under Supreme Court repair guidelines. Issue Whether the expenditure incurred by a textile manufacturing company on replacing independent, sophisticated plant and machinery can be classified as a deductible revenue expenditure or “current repairs,” or if it must be treated as a capital expenditure. Facts The assessee… Read More »

Parallel scrutiny and audit proceedings are valid separate actions under GST despite structural corporate changes.

By | July 7, 2026

Parallel scrutiny and audit proceedings are valid separate actions under GST despite structural corporate changes. Issue Whether the revenue department can legally run separate, parallel audit-based and scrutiny-based proceedings for the same period under Sections 65 and 61 of the CGST/TNGST Act, and whether a Show Cause Notice under Section 74 is valid if it… Read More »

Parallel scrutiny and audit proceedings are valid separate actions under GST despite structural corporate changes.

By | July 7, 2026

Parallel scrutiny and audit proceedings are valid separate actions under GST despite structural corporate changes. Issue Whether the revenue department can legally run separate, parallel audit-based and scrutiny-based proceedings for the same period under Sections 65 and 61 of the CGST/TNGST Act, and whether a Show Cause Notice under Section 74 is valid if it… Read More »

Reassessment based on financial notes previously scrutinized during the original assessment constitutes an impermissible change of opinion.

By | July 7, 2026

Reassessment based on financial notes previously scrutinized during the original assessment constitutes an impermissible change of opinion. Issue Whether the Assessing Officer can legally initiate reassessment proceedings under Section 148 to disallow foreign currency transaction losses and warranty provisions when both items were fully disclosed in the original financial notes, explicitly scrutinized via Section 142(1)… Read More »

Cancellation under Section 12AA(3) for financial diversion is valid prospectively from the order date.

By | July 7, 2026

Cancellation under Section 12AA(3) for financial diversion is valid prospectively from the order date. Issue Whether a Show Cause Notice detailing search and survey findings can be quashed as vague or lacking particulars. Whether incriminating materials, including cash and fund diversions to a Managing Trustee’s concerns, justify the cancellation of a trust’s charitable registration. Whether… Read More »

Interest remains mandatory on belated tax payments even if discharged via DRC-03 before SCN.

By | July 7, 2026

Interest remains mandatory on belated tax payments even if discharged via DRC-03 before SCN. Issue Whether statutory interest under Section 50 is legally leviable on differential tax paid voluntarily via Form GST DRC-03 after being pointed out by the department but before the issuance of a formal Show Cause Notice. Whether the department can invoke… Read More »

Total deductions under Heading C cannot exceed the eligible business profits after factoring Section 80-IA reliefs.

By | July 6, 2026

Total deductions under Heading C cannot exceed the eligible business profits after factoring Section 80-IA reliefs. Issue Whether the restriction contained in Section 80-IA(9) requires the deduction allowed under Section 80-IA to be reduced directly from the Gross Total Income during computation, or if it merely caps the quantum of concurrent deductions claimed under Heading… Read More »