Tag Archives: HIGH COURT OF MADRAS

Section 80-IB deduction does not reduce profits for computing Section 80HHC deduction; matter remanded.

By | July 4, 2026

Section 80-IB deduction does not reduce profits for computing Section 80HHC deduction; matter remanded. Issue Whether the restriction under Section 80-IA(9) requires the deduction under Section 80-IB to be reduced from business profits before computing the Section 80HHC deduction, or if it merely restricts the final allowability of the total deductions. Facts For the assessment… Read More »

Deduction under Section 80-IB excludes DEPB/duty drawback; Section 80-IA vs 80-HHC computation issue is remanded.

By | July 4, 2026

Deduction under Section 80-IB excludes DEPB/duty drawback; Section 80-IA vs 80-HHC computation issue is remanded. Issue Issue 1: Whether the relief under Section 80-IA must be deducted from business profits before computing the export deduction under Section 80-HHC, and whether this needs to be re-evaluated based on recent Supreme Court precedent. Issue 2: Whether incentives… Read More »

Foreign bank operations win relief on disallowances under Section 14A, 37, and 115JA regimes

By | July 4, 2026

Foreign bank operations win relief on disallowances under Section 14A, 37, and 115JA regimes Issue Whether the various additions and disallowances made by the Assessing Officer concerning Section 14A exempt income expenses, broken period interest on stock-in-trade, MAT applicability to banking companies, gross taxation of foreign currency loans, intra-entity transactions with the Head Office, taxability… Read More »

GST Authorities Can Lawfully Recover Crystallized Partnership Firm Dues From a Partner’s Personal Bank Account Under Section 79

By | July 3, 2026

GST Authorities Can Lawfully Recover Crystallized Partnership Firm Dues From a Partner’s Personal Bank Account Under Section 79 Issue Whether the GST authorities can lawfully issue a garnishee recovery notice under Section 79(1)(c)(i) to attach the personal bank account of a partner for the crystallized tax liabilities of a partnership firm, without invoking the provisional… Read More »

Invoking Section 74 Instead of Section 74A Invalidation Because It Wrongly Doubles the Taxpayer’s Penalty

By | July 3, 2026

Invoking Section 74 Instead of Section 74A Invalidation Because It Wrongly Doubles the Taxpayer’s Penalty Issue Whether an assessing authority can cure the wrong invocation of Section 74 instead of Section 74A for the assessment period 2024–25 as a mere clerical error, when choosing the wrong section directly alters the taxpayer’s penalty liability from 50%… Read More »

Sprinkling Jaggery Water on Raw Tobacco Is Not Manufacture; Falls Under Heading 2401 As Unmanufactured Tobacco

By | July 3, 2026

Sprinkling Jaggery Water on Raw Tobacco Is Not Manufacture; Falls Under Heading 2401 As Unmanufactured Tobacco Issue Whether the manual processing of raw tobacco—specifically sprinkling jaggery water, shade drying, and bulking—transforms it into a “manufactured” product classifiable under HSN 2403, or if it retains its character to remain classified as “unmanufactured tobacco” under Heading 2401.… Read More »

Cognizance of Income Tax offences taken after July 1, 2024 requires a mandatory prior hearing under BNSS.

By | July 2, 2026

Cognizance of Income Tax offences taken after July 1, 2024 requires a mandatory prior hearing under BNSS. Issue Whether the first proviso to Section 223(1) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS)—which mandates that a Magistrate cannot take cognizance of an offence without giving the accused an opportunity of being heard—applies to criminal complaints… Read More »

Best Judgment Reassessment Is Invalid If Return Filed Is Completely Ignored By Assessing Officer

By | July 2, 2026

Best Judgment Reassessment Is Invalid If Return Filed Is Completely Ignored By Assessing Officer Issue Whether a draft assessment order passed on a “best judgment” basis under Section 144, on the false premise that the assessee failed to file a return of income, is legally sustainable when the return was actually filed in response to… Read More »

Exclusive reliance on portal upload to serve orders without alternative modes justifies condoning appeal delay.

By | June 30, 2026

Exclusive reliance on portal upload to serve orders without alternative modes justifies condoning appeal delay. Exclusive reliance on portal upload to serve orders without alternative modes justifies condoning appeal delay. Issue Whether uploading an assessment order solely on the GST portal constitutes sufficient communication to trigger the strict limitation period for filing an appeal, especially… Read More »

Extended Limitation Justified for Fictitious ITC, but SCN Omission Nullifies Gobichettipalayam Adjudication Order

By | June 30, 2026

Extended Limitation Justified for Fictitious ITC, but SCN Omission Nullifies Gobichettipalayam Adjudication Order Issue Whether the Department was justified in invoking the extended period of limitation based on inspection findings of circular trading, and whether a final tax demand (DRC-07) can be sustained without issuing a prior Show Cause Notice (DRC-01) following a court-ordered remand.… Read More »