Tag Archives: IN THE ITAT KOLKATA BENCH

Executing a JDA granting construction rights alone does not constitute transfer or trigger capital gains tax.

By | August 3, 2026

Executing a JDA granting construction rights alone does not constitute transfer or trigger capital gains tax. Issue Whether the execution of a registered Joint Development Agreement (JDA) granting construction and approval rights constitutes a “transfer” under Section 2(47)(v) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 read with Section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, making… Read More »

Assessment under the Black Money Act is void for a Resident Not Ordinarily Resident as foreign shares acquired out of non-taxable foreign income are non-assessable and incorrectly valued.

By | July 23, 2026

Assessment under the Black Money Act is void for a Resident Not Ordinarily Resident as foreign shares acquired out of non-taxable foreign income are non-assessable and incorrectly valued. Assessment under the Black Money Act is void for a Resident Not Ordinarily Resident as foreign shares acquired out of non-taxable foreign income are non-assessable and incorrectly… Read More »

Transfer pricing adjustments, historical royalty, straight-line lease rents, and block depreciation are allowed; warranty provision is remanded.

By | July 10, 2026

Transfer pricing adjustments, historical royalty, straight-line lease rents, and block depreciation are allowed; warranty provision is remanded. Issue Whether the revenue authorities are legally justified in: Determinining the Arm’s Length Price (ALP) of intra-group technical services and royalty as “nil” despite documented commercial benefits. Capitalizing recurring royalty expenses that were treated as revenue expenditures in… Read More »

Royalty and straight-line lease rent are allowed, while the warranty provision is remanded for scientific verification.

By | July 10, 2026

Royalty and straight-line lease rent are allowed, while the warranty provision is remanded for scientific verification. Issue Whether the tax authorities can determine the Arm’s Length Price (ALP) of intra-group technical services at nil despite documented commercial benefits, treat historically allowed monthly royalty payments as capital expenses, disallow Accounting Standard-19 straight-line lease rents as notional,… Read More »

Sale proceeds from undisputed prior-year unlisted investments cannot be treated as unexplained cash credits.

By | July 9, 2026

Sale proceeds from undisputed prior-year unlisted investments cannot be treated as unexplained cash credits. Issue Whether the sale proceeds from the disposal of unlisted equity investments, which originated in unchecked prior years, can be treated as unexplained cash credits under section 68, and whether an ad hoc addition for commission expenses can be made under… Read More »

An asset transferred via a slump sale cannot be isolated and taxed again upon registration.

By | July 9, 2026

An asset transferred via a slump sale cannot be isolated and taxed again upon registration. Issue Whether the revenue department can separately tax the subsequent registration of a conveyance deed for an immovable property under Section 50C in a later assessment year, when that specific asset was already transferred and taxed as part of a… Read More »

Ex-parte assessment order set aside and remanded for fresh hearing after condoning a 1439-day delay.

By | July 2, 2026

Ex-parte assessment order set aside and remanded for fresh hearing after condoning a 1439-day delay. Ex-parte assessment order set aside and remanded for fresh hearing after condoning a 1439-day delay. Issue Whether a substantial delay of 1,439 days in filing an appeal before the CIT(A) should be condoned, and the matter remanded for fresh assessment,… Read More »

Bogus purchase additions based on mere suspicion and estimation without book defects must be deleted.

By | June 26, 2026

Bogus purchase additions based on mere suspicion and estimation without book defects must be deleted. Issue Whether the Assessing Officer and the CIT(A) were justified in sustaining an addition for alleged bogus purchases based on third-party search statements, despite the assessee providing comprehensive quantitative reconciliations, direct Section 133(6) confirmations, and faultless audited books of account.… Read More »

CIT(A) was justified in deleting Section 68 addition as the share sale transaction was fully substantiated.

By | June 26, 2026

CIT(A) was justified in deleting Section 68 addition as the share sale transaction was fully substantiated. Issue Whether the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] was justified in deleting an addition made by the Assessing Officer under Section 68 on account of an alleged bogus sale of unlisted equity shares by the amalgamating companies prior to… Read More »