Tag Archives: IN THE ITAT SURAT BENCH

Flawed CIT(A) order ignoring assessment grounds and new agricultural land evidence warrants de novo remand. Flawed CIT(A) order ignoring assessment grounds and new agricultural land evidence warrants de novo remand. Issue Whether an appellate order passed under Section 250—based on the incorrect factual premise that the appeal arose from a Section 154 rectification order rather… Read More »

Rural agricultural land is not a capital asset, and hereditary ancestral land incurs no unexplained investment cost. Issue Whether the Assessing Officer was justified in taxing capital gains on the sale of rural agricultural land and making an addition for unexplained investment under Section 69B on hereditary ancestral land. Facts The assessee, an individual, did… Read More »