A GST assessment order passed in the name of a deceased sole proprietor is a nullity.

By | May 26, 2026

A GST assessment order passed in the name of a deceased sole proprietor is a nullity.

Issue

Whether a GST assessment order determining a tax liability is legally sustainable if it is issued in the name of a sole proprietorship concern after the death of its sole proprietor.

Facts

  • AR Rahman Spices was a sole proprietorship business entity owned and operated by S. Majeeth.

  • The sole proprietor, S. Majeeth, passed away on June 30, 2023.

  • Following his death, the revenue department continued tax proceedings against the firm and passed a final assessment order determining a tax liability on April 25, 2024.

  • The impugned assessment order was issued directly in the name of the defunct sole proprietorship concern.

  • The petitioner challenged the validity of this post-death assessment order by filing a writ petition before the High Court.

Decision

  • Order Declared a Nullity: The High Court observed that the impugned assessment order was passed significantly after the date of death of the sole proprietor.

  • Unsustainable Liability: Because a sole proprietorship has no legal identity separate from its owner, an order issued against a deceased individual is a legal nullity and cannot be sustained.

  • Order Quashed with Liberty: The High Court allowed the writ petition and completely quashed the tax demand order. However, the department was granted explicit liberty to issue a fresh notice to the legal heirs and proceed in accordance with the law.

Key Takeaways

  • No Tax Demands on the Deceased: A tax assessment order cannot be issued against a dead person; any such order passed post-death without bringing legal representatives on record is void ab initio (invalid from the beginning).

  • Proprietorship Has No Separate Identity: Unlike a corporate entity, a sole proprietorship ceases to exist upon the death of its proprietor. Legal proceedings must pivot to face the legal heirs rather than the trading name.

  • Procedural Reset for Revenue: Quashing an order due to the death of a taxpayer does not automatically wipe out the underlying tax liability; the revenue department retains the statutory right under Section 93 to restart the process against the surviving legal heirs.

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
M.Yasir Rahuman
v.
Deputy State Tax Officer/Deputy Commercial Tax Officer*
D. Bharatha Chakravarthy, J.
W.P.(MD) No. 14010 of 2026
W.M.P.(MD) Nos.10455 & 10456 of 2026
APRIL  30, 2026
S. Sakthi Siddharth for the Petitioner. R. Suresh Kumar, Addl. Govt. Pleader for the Respondent.
ORDER
1. This writ petition challenges the impugned order of assessment dated 25.04.2024 passed under Section 73 of the Tamil Nadu Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.
2. After hearing the learned counsel on either side, it is seen that AR Rahman Spices is a proprietorship concern run by one S. Majeeth. The proprietor of the said firm, namely, S. Majeeth, died on 30.06.2023. However, the impugned order came to be passed subsequent to his death and, as such, the same is a nullity.
3. In view thereof, this writ petition stands allowed and the impugned order dated 25.04.2024 is quashed. However, the respondent is at liberty to issue a fresh notice to the legal heirs of the deceased and proceed in the matter in accordance with law. Needless to state, since it is submitted that the legal heirs do not have access to the online portal, any show cause notice, if issued, shall be served in physical form. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.
Category: GST

About CA Satbir Singh

Chartered Accountant having 12+ years of Experience in Taxation , Finance and GST related matters and can be reached at Email : Taxheal@gmail.com