Unclaimed Pre-Approval Income Tax Demands Extinguish Upon NCLT Approval of Resolution Plan Under IBC
Issue
Whether income tax demand notices issued under Section 156 in respect of claims not included in an NCLT-approved resolution plan under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 are sustainable in law.
Facts
-
Resolution Plan Approval: The petitioner’s resolution plan was duly approved by the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) under Sections 30 and 31 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC).
-
Tax Demands Issued: The Income Tax Department issued notice(s) of demand under Section 156 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for tax claims against the petitioner.
-
Non-Inclusion of Claims: The tax claims forming the basis of the impugned demand notices were not part of the resolution plan approved by the Adjudicating Authority (NCLT).
-
Challenge by Assessee: The petitioner challenged the sustainability of the impugned demand notices, contending that all claims not included in the approved resolution plan stood extinguished under Section 31 of the IBC.
Decision
-
Held in favor of the assessee.
-
On the date of approval of a resolution plan by the Adjudicating Authority, all claims that do not form part of the resolution plan stand permanently extinguished.
-
No person or authority is entitled to initiate or continue any legal proceedings in respect of claims not included in the approved resolution plan.
-
The impugned demand notices issued under Section 156 were held unsustainable in law and were quashed and set aside.
Key Takeaways
-
Clean Slate Principle: Upon NCLT approval of a resolution plan under Section 31 of the IBC, the successful resolution applicant takes over the corporate debtor on a clean slate.
-
Extinguishment of Unclaimed Tax Dues: Any past statutory claims or tax demands—including income tax liabilities—that were not incorporated into the approved resolution plan stand completely extinguished.
-
Bar on Subsequent Proceedings: The Income Tax Department cannot issue demand notices under Section 156 or initiate/continue recovery proceedings for pre-approval dues omitted from the resolution plan.
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
Sanghvi Forging and Engineering Ltd.
v.
Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax
A.S. Supehia and Ms. VAIBHAVI D. NANAVATI, JJ.
R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 20438 of 2018
SEPTEMBER 8, 2026
B.S. Soparkar for the Petitioner. Karan G. Sanghani for the Respondent.
ORDER
A.S. Supehia, J.- Learned advocate Mr. B.S. Soparkar, appearing for the petitioner has tendered a copy of the order dated 26.04.2021 passed by the National Company Law Tribunal, Ahmedabad Bench, Ahmedabad in Vikram Sanghvi v. Bank of Baroda [2021] 130 (NCLT – Ahd.)/ I.A. No.130 of 2021 and I.A. No.143 of 2021 in C.P. (IB) No.197 of 2018, whereby the resolution plan in respect of the present petitioner has been approved under Sections 30(6) and 31 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. In view thereof, the status of the present writ petitioner no longer survives.
2. Learned Senior Standing Counsel Mr. Karan G. Sanghani is unable to dispute the aforesaid position.
3. Thus, in view of the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Ghanashyam Mishra and Sons (P.) Ltd. v. Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction Co. Ltd (SC), wherein the Supreme Court has held that once a resolution plan is duly approved by the Adjudicating Authority under sub-section (1) of Section 31 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, the claims as provided in the resolution plan shall stand frozen and shall be binding on the Corporate Debtor and its employees, members, creditors, including the Central Government, any State Government or any local authority, guarantors and other stakeholders. The Supreme Court has further held that, on the date of approval of the resolution plan by the Adjudicating Authority, all such claims which are not a part of the resolution plan shall stand extinguished and no person shall be entitled to initiate or continue any proceedings in respect of a claim which is not part of the resolution plan.
4. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands allowed in view of the undisputed fact and proposition of law. The impugned notices are hereby quashed and set aside.

