Tag Archives: HIGH COURT OF DELHI

Once DTVS Scheme declaration is accepted and Form 2 issued, CIT(A) must defer proceedings and dismiss appeal as withdrawn upon Form 4 issuance

By | August 1, 2026

Once DTVS Scheme declaration is accepted and Form 2 issued, CIT(A) must defer proceedings and dismiss appeal as withdrawn upon Form 4 issuance Issue Whether the CIT(A)/NFAC can adjudicate an appeal on merits and remand the matter to the Assessing Officer when the assessee has already settled the dispute under the Direct Tax Vivad se… Read More »

Disallowance Under Section 14A Cannot Be Added When Computing Book Profits Under Section 115JB

By | July 30, 2026

Disallowance Under Section 14A Cannot Be Added When Computing Book Profits Under Section 115JB Disallowance Under Section 14A Cannot Be Added When Computing Book Profits Under Section 115JB Issue Whether expenses disallowed under Section 14A read with Rule 8D can be added back to compute book profits under Section 115JB under Explanation 1(f) of the… Read More »

Once Form 2 Is Issued Under VSVS, CIT(A) Cannot Remand Assessment; Proceedings Stand Settled Conclusively

By | July 30, 2026

Once Form 2 Is Issued Under VSVS, CIT(A) Cannot Remand Assessment; Proceedings Stand Settled Conclusively Issue Whether the CIT(A)/NFAC and Tribunal erred in deciding and remanding an appeal when a declaration under the Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, 2024 had already been accepted with Form No. 2 issued and full payment made. Facts Pendency… Read More »

Relevant Date for Unutilized ITC Refund Is Return Due Date, Not the Export Date

By | July 18, 2026

Relevant Date for Unutilized ITC Refund Is Return Due Date, Not the Export Date Issue Whether the “relevant date” for computing the two-year limitation period for a refund of unutilized Input Tax Credit (ITC) on zero-rated exports is governed by the export date under Explanation 2(a) or the return filing due date under Explanation 2(e)… Read More »

Reassessment is validly initiated under Section 143(1), but interest on earmarked funds reduces pre-operative expenses.

By | July 17, 2026

Reassessment is validly initiated under Section 143(1), but interest on earmarked funds reduces pre-operative expenses. Issue Whether the Assessing Officer can validly reopen an assessment under Section 147 when the original return was only processed under Section 143(1) and no formal scrutiny assessment order was passed. Whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal has the jurisdiction… Read More »

Adjudicating Officer Determining Tax Under Section 74 Is Fully Competent to Impose Consequential Penalties

By | July 15, 2026

Adjudicating Officer Determining Tax Under Section 74 Is Fully Competent to Impose Consequential Penalties Issue Whether the proper officer adjudicating a tax liability under Section 74 of the CGST Act has the legal competence and jurisdiction to simultaneously impose consequential penalties under Section 122 within the same adjudication order, or if a separate penalty proceeding… Read More »

Unrecorded warranty receivables from an AE constitute an asset, validating extended reassessment and special audit.

By | July 9, 2026

Unrecorded warranty receivables from an AE constitute an asset, validating extended reassessment and special audit. Issue Whether unrecorded contractual receivables from an Associated Enterprise (AE) for warranty reimbursements constitute an “asset” under Section 153A, allowing the extended 10-year reassessment notice window under Section 149(1)(b). Whether an extended reassessment notice can be sustained if the recorded… Read More »

Department Must Release Deposited Refund to Taxpayer Absent an Explicit Interim Stay From the Tribunal

By | July 7, 2026

Department Must Release Deposited Refund to Taxpayer Absent an Explicit Interim Stay From the Tribunal Issue Whether the revenue department can withhold a sanctioned GST refund amount deposited with the Court’s Registrar General, when its appeal is pending before the Appellate Tribunal but no interim stay order has been granted against the release. Facts Initial… Read More »

Condonation of delay for filing Form 10-IC is rejected due to prolonged corporate non-compliance.

By | June 30, 2026

Condonation of delay for filing Form 10-IC is rejected due to prolonged corporate non-compliance. Issue Whether the Commissioner was legally justified in rejecting the assessee-company’s application under Section 119(2)(b) for condonation of delay in filing Form 10-IC to claim the concessional tax rate under Section 115BAA, when the application was filed beyond the three-year limit… Read More »

Notice Under Section 148 Issued After Limitation Expiry Is Valid If Delay Occurred Due To Assessee Adjournment Requests

By | June 27, 2026

Notice Under Section 148 Issued After Limitation Expiry Is Valid If Delay Occurred Due To Assessee Adjournment Requests Issue Whether a reassessment notice issued under Section 148 after the normal limitation date is time-barred, or if the time consumed by granting extensions requested by the assessee during pre-notice proceedings can be excluded under the fifth… Read More »