GST Appeal Stayed: Interim Relief Granted Due to Non-Constitution of Tribunal

By | February 6, 2025

GST Appeal Stayed: Interim Relief Granted Due to Non-Constitution of Tribunal

Summary in Key Points:

  • Issue: Should interim relief be granted to the assessee who is unable to file an appeal due to the non-constitution of the Appellate Tribunal?

  • Facts: The assessee sought to appeal an order passed by the first appellate authority. However, the Appellate Tribunal was not yet constituted, preventing the assessee from filing their appeal.

  • Decision: Following the precedent set in Maa Tarini Traders v. State of Odisha, the court granted an interim stay on the impugned order, subject to the assessee depositing 10% of the disputed tax amount.

Important Note: This decision highlights the challenges faced by taxpayers when appellate tribunals are not constituted. It demonstrates the court’s willingness to provide interim relief in such situations, recognizing that the assessee’s right to appeal is hindered by factors outside their control. The requirement to deposit a portion of the disputed tax amount balances the interests of the taxpayer and the revenue while ensuring that the assessee’s appeal can be heard once the tribunal is functional. This ruling provides a practical solution to address the issue of delayed justice due to administrative delays in constituting tribunals.

HIGH COURT OF ORISSA
Rajesh Swain
v.
Joint Commissioner of State Tax (Appeal) CT and GST
Arindam Sinha and M.S. Sahoo, JJ.
W.P.(C) No.69 of 2025
JANUARY  8, 2025
S. Tibrewal, Adv. for the Petitioner. S. Das, Addl. Standing Counsel for the Respondent.
ORDER
1. Mr. Tibrewal, learned advocate appears on behalf of petitioner and submits, his client is aggrieved by order dated 16th September, 2023 made by the First Appellate Authority. He wants to appeal therefrom to the Tribunal but it has not yet been constituted. In the circumstances assessees and the department were complying with directions made on order dated 16th February, 2024 by the First Division Bench in a batch of writ petitions, lead case being WP(C) no.42015 of 2023 (M/s. Maa Tarini Traders v. State of Odisha and others).
2. The directions included requiring the assessee to deposit 10% of the disputed amount of tax on filing the appeal and further 20% of remaining disputed tax, for the impugned order to be stayed.
3. He submits, his client is up against State revenue. There was notification dated 16th August, 2024 made by Central revenue reducing latter deposit to 10%. Now, State revenue has correspondingly notified on 29th October, 2024. In the circumstances, the writ petition be disposed of as covered by order dated 16th February, 2024 (supra) with modification for deposit of 10% of remaining disputed tax for impugned order to remain stayed.
4. Mr. Das, learned advocate, Additional Standing Counsel appears on behalf of State revenue.
5. We accept submission made on behalf of petitioner regarding corresponding notification reducing requirement of the deposit to 10% of disputed tax for impugned first appellate order to remain stayed. The deposit be made accordingly.
6. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of.
Category: GST

About CA Satbir Singh

Chartered Accountant having 12+ years of Experience in Taxation , Finance and GST related matters and can be reached at Email : Taxheal@gmail.com