Reassessment Notice Issued Beyond Ten-Year Limit Is Time-Barred and Liable to Be Quashed

By | June 1, 2026

Reassessment Notice Issued Beyond Ten-Year Limit Is Time-Barred and Liable to Be Quashed

Issue

Whether a reassessment notice issued under Section 148 on March 31, 2024, for the Assessment Year 2013-14, is legally sustainable or if it must be quashed as time-barred for exceeding the absolute statutory limitation period of 10 years when calculated backward from the relevant assessment year of issuance.

Facts

  • The Assessing Officer issued a reassessment notice under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, to the assessee.

  • The impugned notice was dated and issued on March 31, 2024.

  • The Tax Department issued this notice specifically targeting the Assessment Year 2013-14 to reopen an alleged income escaping assessment.

  • The financial date of issuance (March 31, 2024) falls within the financial year 2023-24, making the corresponding relevant assessment year 2024-25.

  • Aggrieved by the retroactive action, the assessee filed a writ petition before the High Court challenging the legal validity of the notice on the grounds of limitation.

Decision

  • Held, yes: For a notice issued on March 31, 2024, the governing baseline for counting limitation boundaries backward is the relevant Assessment Year 2024-25.

  • Held, yes: Counting backward from the Assessment Year 2024-25, the maximum permissible 10-year statutory window for reassessment completely expires long before reaching the targeted Assessment Year 2013-14.

  • Held, yes: Because the notice for Assessment Year 2013-14 was issued clearly beyond this absolute 10-year outer boundary, it violates the time limits prescribed under Section 149.

  • Held, yes: Consequently, the impugned Section 148 notice is held to be entirely time-barred and is ordered to be quashed, ruling in favor of the assessee.

Key Takeaways

  • The Absolute 10-Year Outer Cap: The Tax Department possesses no residual power to reopen assessments or issue notices under Section 148 if the targeted assessment year sits more than 10 years backward from the assessment year in which the notice is being issued.

  • Baseline Calculation Rules: Limitation periods are calculated using the assessment year belonging to the date of the notice’s actual issuance as the starting point, not the old year that the Revenue intends to audit.

  • Writ Jurisdiction is Appropriate for Limitation: When a reassessment notice is visibly and mathematically time-barred on its face, an assessee is justified in approaching the High Court via a writ petition to get the unlawful proceedings quashed immediately.

HIGH COURT OF DELHI
H.M. Infracon (P.) Ltd.
v.
Income-tax*
Dinesh Mehta and Vinod Kumar, JJ.
W.P. (C) No. 9699 OF 2024
CM APPL. No. 39793 OF 2024
MAY  19, 2026
Ruchesh SinhaMs. Shilpa Choudhary and Ms. Monalisa Maity, Advs. for the Petitioner. Gaurav Gupta, SSC, Shivendra SinghYojit Pareek, JSCss and Surya Jindal, Adv. for the Respondent.
ORDER
1. By way of present writ petition preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has challenged the notice dated 31.03.2024 issued by respondents-Department for assessment year 2013-14 under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act of 1961’).
2. Learned Counsel for the petitioner at the outset argued that the impugned notice is beyond the time period prescribed under Section 149 read with Section 153A of the Act of 1961, as prevailing at the relevant time (AY 2013-14).
3. He submitted that the issue involved in the present writ petition is squarely covered by judgments of this Court rendered in the case of Pr. CIT (Central-1) v. Ojjus Medicare (P.) Ltd. (Delhi)/[2024] 465 ITR 101 (Delhi).
4. Mr. Gaurav Gupta, learned Senior Standing Counsel for the respondents-Department could not dispute the aforesaid position of facts involved.
5. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
6. Needless to mention that since the impugned notice was issued on 31.03.2024, the relevant assessment year is 2024-25. Therefore, the notice impugned issued qua assessment year 2013-14 is clearly beyond the period of 10 years, if calculated backward from assessment year 2024-25.
7. The notice impugned is, thus, quashed being time-barred. (In re: Ojjus Medicare Pvt. Ltd. (supra) and Dinesh Jindal (supra)).
8. The writ petition is allowed. Pending application stands disposed of.