Reassessment Notice for AY 2013-14 Issued on 31.03.2024 Quashed as Beyond Ten-Year Limit

By | June 1, 2026

Reassessment Notice for AY 2013-14 Issued on 31.03.2024 Quashed as Beyond Ten-Year Limit

Issue

Whether a reassessment notice issued under Section 148 on March 31, 2024, for the Assessment Year 2013-14 is legally sustainable, or if it must be quashed as time-barred for exceeding the absolute 10-year statutory limitation period when calculated backward from the assessment year of issuance.

Facts

  • The Notice: The Assessing Officer issued a reassessment notice under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act to reopen the assessment of the petitioner.

  • Target Period: The impugned notice targeted the income escaping assessment for the Assessment Year 2013-14.

  • Date of Issuance: The Tax Department signed and issued this specific notice on March 31, 2024.

  • Chronological Baseline: The date of issuance (March 31, 2024) falls within the Financial Year 2023-24, which establishes the corresponding relevant Assessment Year as 2024-25.

  • Legal Challenge: Aggrieved by the retroactive action, the assessee filed a writ petition before the High Court to challenge the notice’s validity on the grounds of limitation.

Decision

  • Held, yes: For a reassessment notice issued on March 31, 2024, the legal baseline for calculating the limitation period backward is the relevant Assessment Year 2024-25.

  • Held, yes: When calculating backward from the Assessment Year 2024-25, the maximum permissible 10-year statutory window for reopening assessments expires long before reaching the targeted Assessment Year 2013-14.

  • Held, yes: Because the notice for Assessment Year 2013-14 was issued clearly beyond this absolute 10-year outer boundary, it directly violates the strict time limits prescribed under Section 149.

  • Held, yes: Consequently, the impugned Section 148 notice is entirely time-barred, holds no legal validity, and is ordered to be quashed in favor of the assessee.

Key Takeaways

  • The Absolute 10-Year Outer Cap: The Tax Department holds no residual power to reopen past assessments if the targeted assessment year sits more than 10 years backward from the assessment year in which the notice is issued.

  • Backward Calculation Rules: Statutory limitation boundaries are determined by counting backward from the assessment year belonging to the date of the notice’s actual issuance, not from the old year that the Revenue intends to audit.

  • Writ Intervention for Limitation: Where an income escaping assessment notice is demonstrably and mathematically time-barred on its face, an assessee can directly approach the High Court via a writ petition to quash the unlawful proceedings without exhausting alternative remedies.

HIGH COURT OF DELHI
H.M. Infracon (P.) Ltd.
v.
Income-tax*
Dinesh Mehta and Vinod Kumar, JJ.
W.P. (C) No. 9699 OF 2024
CM APPL. No. 39793 OF 2024
MAY  19, 2026
Ruchesh SinhaMs. Shilpa Choudhary and Ms. Monalisa Maity, Advs. for the Petitioner. Gaurav Gupta, SSC, Shivendra SinghYojit Pareek, JSCss and Surya Jindal, Adv. for the Respondent.
ORDER
1. By way of present writ petition preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has challenged the notice dated 31.03.2024 issued by respondents-Department for assessment year 2013-14 under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act of 1961’).
2. Learned Counsel for the petitioner at the outset argued that the impugned notice is beyond the time period prescribed under Section 149 read with Section 153A of the Act of 1961, as prevailing at the relevant time (AY 2013-14).
3. He submitted that the issue involved in the present writ petition is squarely covered by judgments of this Court rendered in the case of Pr. CIT (Central-1) v. Ojjus Medicare (P.) Ltd. (Delhi)/[2024] 465 ITR 101 (Delhi).
4. Mr. Gaurav Gupta, learned Senior Standing Counsel for the respondents-Department could not dispute the aforesaid position of facts involved.
5. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
6. Needless to mention that since the impugned notice was issued on 31.03.2024, the relevant assessment year is 2024-25. Therefore, the notice impugned issued qua assessment year 2013-14 is clearly beyond the period of 10 years, if calculated backward from assessment year 2024-25.
7. The notice impugned is, thus, quashed being time-barred. (In re: Ojjus Medicare Pvt. Ltd. (supra) and Dinesh Jindal (supra)).
8. The writ petition is allowed. Pending application stands disposed of.