Tag Archives: Additional Commissioner

Bunching multiple financial years into a single GST assessment order is invalid and without jurisdiction.

By | September 22, 2026

Bunching multiple financial years into a single GST assessment order is invalid and without jurisdiction. Issue Whether the GST authorities have the jurisdiction to issue a single composite Show Cause Notice or assessment order by clubbing multiple financial years under Section 73, or if year-wise proceedings are mandatory. Facts Period Involved: The tax period under… Read More »

Penalty and Tax Under Section 129 Sustained as E-Way Bill Generation Post-Interception Proves Intent to Evade

By | September 21, 2026

Penalty and Tax Under Section 129 Sustained as E-Way Bill Generation Post-Interception Proves Intent to Evade Issue Whether tax and penalty under Section 129 can be sustained for non-production of an e-way bill during transit when a new e-way bill for a different delivery destination is generated post-interception, and whether post-detention regularization cures the statutory… Read More »

Supreme Court Dismisses SLP, Permitting Assessee to File Statutory Appeal Before GSTAT with Limitation Relief

By | September 12, 2026

Supreme Court Dismisses SLP, Permitting Assessee to File Statutory Appeal Before GSTAT with Limitation Relief Supreme Court Dismisses SLP, Permitting Assessee to File Statutory Appeal Before GSTAT with Limitation Relief Issue Whether an assessee who withdraws a writ petition from the High Court can be granted liberty to file a statutory appeal before the Goods… Read More »

Show Cause Notice Reissuance Continuation of Quashed Notice Set Aside Following Precedent

By | September 10, 2026

Show Cause Notice Reissuance Continuation of Quashed Notice Set Aside Following Precedent Issue Whether a Show Cause Notice issued under Section 74/104 to continue a previously quashed notice is valid when the underlying legal controversy stands already settled by a coordinate Division Bench decision. Facts The petitioner-assessee sought the quashing of a Show Cause Notice… Read More »

ITC Cannot Be Denied for Supplier Default Before Recovery Action Nor Under Time-Barred Section 74 Notices

By | September 7, 2026

ITC Cannot Be Denied for Supplier Default Before Recovery Action Nor Under Time-Barred Section 74 Notices Issue Whether Input Tax Credit (ITC) can be denied to a recipient under Section 16(2)(c) solely due to non-payment of tax or non-reflection in GSTR-2A by the supplier, without first pursuing recovery against the supplier. Whether Section 74 can… Read More »

Presumption of e-Way Bill reuse without concrete proof of prior delivery cannot sustain detention under Section 129.

By | September 4, 2026

Presumption of e-Way Bill reuse without concrete proof of prior delivery cannot sustain detention under Section 129. Issue Whether detention of goods and imposition of penalty under Section 129 based on a presumption of e-Way Bill and invoice reuse is legally sustainable in the absence of concrete proof establishing a prior completed journey or delivery.… Read More »

Supreme Court Dismisses SLP Since Section 74 Demands Fail Without Specific Findings Of Fraud

By | August 19, 2026

Supreme Court Dismisses SLP Since Section 74 Demands Fail Without Specific Findings Of Fraud Supreme Court Dismisses SLP Since Section 74 Demands Fail Without Specific Findings Of Fraud Issue Whether proceedings under Section 74 can be sustained against a buyer for claiming Input Tax Credit when the taxpayer proves actual movement of goods and tax… Read More »

Writ Inadmissible As GSTAT Is Constituted And Appeal Timelines Are Extended Till June 2026

By | August 5, 2026

Writ Inadmissible As GSTAT Is Constituted And Appeal Timelines Are Extended Till June 2026 Issue Whether a writ petition under Article 226 is maintainable against a First Appellate Order when the Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT) stands notified and operationalized with extended timelines for filing appeals under Section 112. Facts The dispute pertained… Read More »

An officer approving prosecution cannot subsequently act as the adjudicating authority due to bias.

By | August 3, 2026

An officer approving prosecution cannot subsequently act as the adjudicating authority due to bias. Issue Whether an officer who countersigned and approved an investigation report for prosecution can subsequently act as the quasi-judicial adjudicating authority in the same matter without violating principles of natural justice and triggering reasonable apprehension of bias. Facts Taxpayer Details: The… Read More »

Composite show-cause notice and consequential orders covering multiple financial years under Section 73 are invalid.

By | August 3, 2026

Composite show-cause notice and consequential orders covering multiple financial years under Section 73 are invalid. Composite show-cause notice and consequential orders covering multiple financial years under Section 73 are invalid. Issue Whether the Revenue can issue a single consolidated Show-Cause Notice (SCN) and pass a composite assessment order covering multiple financial years under Section 73… Read More »