Tag Archives: NEW DELHI BENCH

Increasing Movie Ticket Base Prices to Retain Post-Tax Reduction Rates Constitutes Illegal Anti-Profiteering

By | September 2, 2026

Increasing Movie Ticket Base Prices to Retain Post-Tax Reduction Rates Constitutes Illegal Anti-Profiteering Issue Whether a supplier of admission to movie exhibitions violates Section 171 of the CGST/TGST Act, 2017 by increasing the base price of tickets to maintain identical post-tax (cum-tax) sale prices following a reduction in GST rate, thereby failing to pass on… Read More »

Developer Must Pass On Residual ₹14.94 Lakh Anti-Profiteering ITC Benefit With Interest and Penalty

By | August 22, 2026

Developer Must Pass On Residual ₹14.94 Lakh Anti-Profiteering ITC Benefit With Interest and Penalty Issue Whether a real estate developer is liable under Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017 to pass on a residual profiteered Input Tax Credit (ITC) amount of ₹14,94,622 along with interest and penalty to 25 homebuyers after making partial pass-through… Read More »

No Contravention Holds as Developer Passed Recomputed Additional ITC Benefits to Buyers Exceeding Profiteered Amount

By | August 14, 2026

No Contravention Holds as Developer Passed Recomputed Additional ITC Benefits to Buyers Exceeding Profiteered Amount Issue Whether the developer contravened Section 171 of the CGST/DGST Act, 2017, after DGAP re-computed the additional Input Tax Credit (ITC) benefit following directions from the Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT). Facts A homebuyer of a Tower-1 unit filed a complaint alleging… Read More »

Provisional and Confirmed Benami Attachment Valid Despite Prior PMLA Attachment Due to Non-Disclosure

By | July 27, 2026

Provisional and Confirmed Benami Attachment Valid Despite Prior PMLA Attachment Due to Non-Disclosure Provisional and Confirmed Benami Attachment Valid Despite Prior PMLA Attachment Due to Non-Disclosure Issue Whether an Initiating Officer can validly pass and continue a provisional attachment under Section 24 of the PBPT Act, 1988, leading to confirmation under Section 26(3), when the… Read More »

Cinema operator ordered to deposit profiteered amount into consumer funds for withholding GST rate reduction.

By | June 24, 2026

Cinema operator ordered to deposit profiteered amount into consumer funds for withholding GST rate reduction. Issue Whether the respondent failed to pass on the benefit of a GST rate reduction from 18% to 12% on cinema admission tickets by commensurately reducing ticket prices, and whether its unilateral increase in the base price of the tickets… Read More »