Daily Archives: October 8, 2025

Judicial Victory for Service Exporters: Principal-to-Principal Contracts Qualify as Export of Services

By | October 8, 2025

Judicial Victory for Service Exporters: Principal-to-Principal Contracts Qualify as Export of Services The Rajasthan High Court delivered a significant ruling clarifying the distinction between “Export of Services” (zero-rated, eligible for IGST refund) and “Intermediary” services (taxed in India). The court held that services provided under a direct, principal-to-principal contract to a foreign client are exports,… Read More »

Category: GST

Tax Authorities Must Dispose of Rectification Applications Within Six Months: Madras HC

By | October 8, 2025

Tax Authorities Must Dispose of Rectification Applications Within Six Months: Madras HC   The Madras High Court ruled that a rectification application filed by a taxpayer under Section 161 of the CGST Act must be compulsorily disposed of by the tax authorities within the maximum period of six months from the date the original order,… Read More »

Category: GST

Advocate Privilege Upheld: Searches Require Strict Judicial Safeguards

By | October 8, 2025

Advocate Privilege Upheld: Searches Require Strict Judicial Safeguards   The Delhi High Court delivered a crucial ruling affirming that searches of an advocate’s office, documents, and electronic devices by GST authorities are permissible only under exceptional circumstances and must be subject to stringent judicial safeguards to protect attorney-client privilege.   Key Points of the Judicial… Read More »

Category: GST

IMPORTANT GST CASE LAW 07.10.2025

By | October 8, 2025

IMPORTANT GST CASE LAW 07.10.2025 Section Case Law Title Brief Summary Citation Relevant Act R.U. Overseas vs. Directorate General of Goods and Services Tax Intelligence DGGIC HC directed the petitioner to avail the appellate remedy for challenging multiple GST Orders-in-Original related to overlapping ITC claims and demands. For the connected appeals, the pre-deposit was confined… Read More »

Category: GST

A demand notice under Section 73 of the CGST Act, 2017, is invalid if it’s not preceded by a scrutiny notice in Form GST ASMT-10 as required by Section 61 of the Act.

By | October 8, 2025

A demand notice under Section 73 of the CGST Act, 2017, is invalid if it’s not preceded by a scrutiny notice in Form GST ASMT-10 as required by Section 61 of the Act. Issue Can the GST authorities initiate demand and recovery proceedings under Section 73 of the CGST Act, 2017, based on discrepancies found… Read More »

The Supreme Court upheld an interim stay on a penalty imposed for not mentioning the “biltee number” (consignment note number) on a tax invoice.

By | October 8, 2025

The Supreme Court upheld an interim stay on a penalty imposed for not mentioning the “biltee number” (consignment note number) on a tax invoice. Issue Is it legally valid for the GST department to impose a penalty on a taxpayer for not mentioning the “biltee number” on a tax invoice, especially when Rule 46 of… Read More »

A court can grant relief from multiple pre-deposits in cases of overlapping GST demands.

By | October 8, 2025

A court can grant relief from multiple pre-deposits in cases of overlapping GST demands. Issue When a taxpayer is faced with multiple, overlapping demand orders and notices from different GST authorities for the exact same issue and period, what is the appropriate legal remedy, and can a court provide relief from the statutory requirement of… Read More »