Daily Archives: October 8, 2025

IMPORTANT INCOME TAX CASE LAW 07.10.2025

By | October 8, 2025

IMPORTANT INCOME TAX CASE LAW 07.10.2025 Section Case Law Title Brief Summary Citation Relevant Act 1 Krishna Nursing Home vs. Income-tax Officer ITAT set aside CIT(A)’s ex parte dismissal of appeal and remanded for fresh hearing, as the assessee missed notices due to severe financial crisis and seizure of business premises, violating principles of natural… Read More »

An ex-parte order passed by an appellate authority was set aside by the court due to the assessee’s demonstrated genuine hardship, which prevented their participation in the hearing.

By | October 8, 2025

An ex-parte order passed by an appellate authority was set aside by the court due to the assessee’s demonstrated genuine hardship, which prevented their participation in the hearing. Issue Should an ex-parte order, passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) for non-appearance, be set aside if the taxpayer can demonstrate that their failure to appear was due… Read More »

The new, stricter rule for utilizing a charitable trust’s accumulated income applies only prospectively to fresh accumulations and does not apply retrospectively to past accumulations.

By | October 8, 2025

The new, stricter rule for utilizing a charitable trust’s accumulated income applies only prospectively to fresh accumulations and does not apply retrospectively to past accumulations. Issue Does the amendment made by the Finance Act, 2022, which restricted the time period for utilizing accumulated income under Section 11(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, apply retrospectively to… Read More »

A final opportunity was granted to an assessee to submit evidence for cash deposits.

By | October 8, 2025

A final opportunity was granted to an assessee to submit evidence for cash deposits. Issue Should a taxpayer who has failed at both the assessment and the first appellate stages to provide any documentary evidence to explain the source of large cash deposits be given a final opportunity by a higher appellate authority in the… Read More »

An addition under Section 68 is invalid if based on mere unsubstantiated doubt.

By | October 8, 2025

An addition under Section 68 is invalid if based on mere unsubstantiated doubt. Issue Can an Assessing Officer make an addition under Section 68 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, by treating the sale proceeds of a share transaction as an unexplained cash credit, based on mere doubt and without bringing any adverse material on record,… Read More »

The condition to invest corpus donations in specified modes is not retrospective.

By | October 8, 2025

The condition to invest corpus donations in specified modes is not retrospective. Issue Can the tax exemption for a corpus donation under Section 11(1)(d) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, for the Assessment Year 2017-18 be denied on the ground that the donation was not invested in the specific modes prescribed under Section 11(5) of the… Read More »

An ex-parte assessment order is invalid if the notice was sent to a wrong email address and was never properly served on the taxpayer.

By | October 8, 2025

An ex-parte assessment order is invalid if the notice was sent to a wrong email address and was never properly served on the taxpayer. Issue Is an ex-parte assessment order, passed under Section 144 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, legally valid if the notice that initiated the proceeding was sent to an incorrect or unused… Read More »

A company that owns its own Intellectual Property (IP) and conducts high-end Research and Development (R&D) is not functionally comparable to a routine software development service provider.

By | October 8, 2025

A company that owns its own Intellectual Property (IP) and conducts high-end Research and Development (R&D) is not functionally comparable to a routine software development service provider. Issue Can a diversified company that is engaged in engineering services, conducts its own R&D, and owns valuable intellectual property be considered a valid comparable in a transfer… Read More »